Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043592›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2017

Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.

Jennifer K Maratt, Joseph Dickens, Philip S Schoenfeld, Grace H Elta, Kenya Jackson, Daniel Rizk, Christine Erickson, Stacy B Menees

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Bowel Preparation in Quality Guidelines and Clinical Practice.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sessile Serrated Lesions: Searching for the True Prevalence and Risk Factors in China.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer K MarattDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA. jkrai@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9218-7391
Joseph DickensUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Philip S SchoenfeldJohn D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Grace H EltaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA.
Kenya JacksonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA.
Daniel RizkUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christine EricksonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA.
Stacy B MeneesDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA.
A. Alfred Taubman Health Care Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · USJohn D. Dingell VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Training Program in Gastrointestinal EpidemiologyT32DK062708 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Peter D.R. Higgins, Elliot Tapper · 2003 to 2026
$3.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdenoma detection rate (ADR) and sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSPDR) data in surveillance colonoscopy are limited.

aimsOur aim was to determine surveillance ADR and SSPDR and identify associated predictors.

methodsA retrospective review of subjects who underwent surveillance colonoscopy for adenoma and/or SSP at an academic center was performed. The following exclusion criteria were applied: prior colonoscopy ≤ 3 years, incomplete examination, or another indication for colonoscopy. Patient, endoscopist, and procedure characteristics were collected. Predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 3807 colonoscopies, 2416 met inclusion criteria. Surveillance ADR was 49% and, SSPDR was 8%. Higher ADR was associated with: age per year (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.04), male gender (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.29-1.88), BMI per kg/m

conclusionsFor surveillance colonoscopy, nearly half of patients had an adenoma and one in twelve had an SSP. In addition to established factors, BMI, endoscopists' screening ADR, and years since training were associated with ADR, whereas African-American race and diabetes were inversely associated with SSPDR. Further studies are needed prior to integrating surveillance ADR and SSPDR into quality metrics.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaAgedColonic NeoplasmsColonic PolypsColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMichiganMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesColonoscopyDetection ratesQuality indicators

Identifiers

PMID29043592
PMCPMC5818715
OpenAlexW2766272077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.