Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043580›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2018

A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Toshiro Masuda, Amanda M Dann, Irmina A Elliott, Hideo Baba, Stephen Kim, Alireza Sedarat, V Raman Muthusamy, Mark D Girgis, O Joe Hines, Howard A Reber and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshiro MasudaDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS Room 72-215, PO Box 956904, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Amanda M DannDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS Room 72-215, PO Box 956904, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Irmina A ElliottDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS Room 72-215, PO Box 956904, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan.
Stephen KimDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alireza SedaratDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
V Raman MuthusamyDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mark D GirgisDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS Room 72-215, PO Box 956904, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
O Joe HinesDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS Room 72-215, PO Box 956904, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Howard A ReberDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS Room 72-215, PO Box 956904, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Timothy R DonahueDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS Room 72-215, PO Box 956904, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. tdonahue@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USKumamoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current (seventh edition) American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) dichotomizes pathologic lymph node (LN) involvement into absence (pN0) or presence (pN1) of disease. The recently announced eighth edition also includes stratification on the number of positive nodes. Furthermore, LNs detected on preoperative imaging (CT, MRI, or endoscopic ultrasound-EUS) are considered to be pathologically involved in other gastrointestinal cancers. However, this is less well defined for PDAC. Therefore, the three aims of this study were to determine (1) whether the new AJCC staging system led to more accurate staging, (2) the number of nodes needed to be examined to detect pathologic involvement, and (3) if pN disease could be reliably detected on preoperative imaging in PDAC.

methodsA retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreatectomy at a single US academic center from January 1990 to September 2015. Pathology reports of resected specimens were reviewed to determine the total number of LNs examined and those positive for metastasis. CT, MRI, and/or EUS reports were used to determine the presence or absence of preoperatively detectable LN enlargement.

resultsOf the 490 surgical resections for PDAC, pN1 disease was detected in 59.4% (n = 291) and was positively correlated with the number of LNs pathologically examined (P < 0.001). Patients with pN1 disease had a shorter overall survival (OS) than those without nodal involvement (25.1 vs. 44.0 months; P < 0.001); however, OS was not different when stratifying by the number of nodes as on the eighth AJCC system. Pathologic examination of > 20 LNs in treatment naïve patients was optimal to detect pN1 disease and predict longer OS for those without nodal involvement (median survival > 41.1 months, P = 0.03 when compared to < 15 or 15-19 LNs examined). LNs were detected by CT, MRI, or EUS in 30.7% (103/335) of patients. The positive predictive value (PPV) of preoperative LN detection for pathologic involvement was 77.3% for treatment naïve patients and 84.2% for those without biliary obstruction.

conclusionsAlthough the LN scoring in the seventh PDAC AJCC Staging System was sufficient to predict OS of our patients, more LNs than previously considered (20 vs. 15) were optimal to detect pathologic involvement. Preoperative LN detection was an accurate predictor of pN1 disease for treatment naïve patients without biliary obstruction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalEndosonographyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsBiliary obstructionLymph nodePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29043580
OpenAlexW2766210686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.