Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043572›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2018

Secreted proteins produced by fungi associated with Botryosphaeria dieback trigger distinct defense responses in Vitis vinifera and Vitis rupestris cells.

E Stempien, M-L Goddard, Y Leva, M Bénard-Gellon, H Laloue, S Farine, F Kieffer-Mazet, C Tarnus, C Bertsch, J Chong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E StempienLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1246-3419
M-L GoddardLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.
Y LevaLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.
M Bénard-GellonLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.
H LaloueLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.
S FarineLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.
F Kieffer-MazetLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.
C TarnusLaboratoire de Chimie Organique et Bio-organique COB EA 4566, Université de Haute-Alsace, 3bis rue Alfred Werner, BP 68093, Mulhouse Cedex, France.
C BertschLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France.
J ChongLaboratoire Vigne Biotechnologie et Environnement LVBE EA 3991, Université de Haute-Alsace, 33 rue de Herrlisheim, BP 68008, Colmar Cedex, France. julie.chong@uha.fr.
Université de Haute-Alsace · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapevine trunk diseases (Eutypa dieback, esca and Botryosphaeria dieback) are caused by a complex of xylem-inhabiting fungi, which severely reduce yields in vineyards. Botryosphaeria dieback is associated with Botryosphaeriaceae. In order to develop effective strategies against Botryosphaeria dieback, we investigated the molecular basis of grapevine interactions with a virulent species, Neofusicoccum parvum, and a weak pathogen, Diplodia seriata. We investigated defenses induced by purified secreted fungal proteins within suspension cells of Vitis (Vitis rupestris and Vitis vinifera cv. Gewurztraminer) with putative different susceptibility to Botryosphaeria dieback. Our results show that Vitis cells are able to detect secreted proteins produced by Botryosphaeriaceae, resulting in a rapid alkalinization of the extracellular medium and the production of reactive oxygen species. Concerning early defense responses, N. parvum proteins induced a more intense response compared to D. seriata. Early and late defense responses, i.e., extracellular medium alkalinization, cell death, and expression of PR defense genes were stronger in V. rupestris compared to V. vinifera, except for stilbene production. Secreted Botryosphaeriaceae proteins triggered a high accumulation of δ-viniferin in V. vinifera suspension cells. Artificial inoculation assays on detached canes with N. parvum and D. seriata showed that the development of necrosis is reduced in V. rupestris compared to V. vinifera cv. Gewurztraminer. This may be related to a more efficient induction of defense responses in V. rupestris, although not sufficient to completely inhibit fungal colonization. Overall, our work shows a specific signature of defense responses depending on the grapevine genotype and the fungal species.

Indexed as

AscomycotaCell DeathExtracellular SpaceFluorescenceFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant CellsPlant StemsPrincipal Component AnalysisReactive Oxygen SpeciesStilbenesVitisFungal ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesStilbenesBotryosphaeria diebackDefense responsesDiplodia seriataExtracellular fungal proteinsNeofusicoccum parvumVitis cell culture

Identifiers

PMID29043572
OpenAlexW2766975757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.