Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043561›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2017

Clinical profile of silent growth hormone pituitary adenomas; higher recurrence rate compared to silent gonadotroph pituitary tumors, a large single center experience.

Fabienne Langlois, Dawn Shao Ting Lim, Elena Varlamov, Chris G Yedinak, Justin S Cetas, Shirley McCartney, Aclan Dogan, Maria Fleseriu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guidelines in the management of CNS tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabienne LangloisDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Dawn Shao Ting LimDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Elena VarlamovDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Chris G YedinakDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Justin S CetasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Shirley McCartneyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Aclan DoganDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Maria FleseriuDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. fleseriu@ohsu.edu.
Neurological Surgery · USOregon Health & Science University · USSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStudy and comparison of characteristics of silent growth hormone adenomas (SGHA), silent corticotroph adenomas (SCA), and silent gonadotroph adenomas (SGA) in a single institution cohort of surgically treated pituitary adenomas.

methodsRetrospective analysis of SGHA surgically resected over 10 years: SGHA was defined as no clinical or biochemical evidence of acromegaly and positive GH immunostaining.

resultsOf 814 pituitary surgeries; 2.1% (n = 17) were SGHA, 4.5% (n = 37) SCA, and 18.9% (n = 70/371; 2011-2016) SGA. Mean age at SGHA diagnosis was 43 years, with a large female predominance (82%). Mean tumor size and cavernous/sphenoid sinus invasiveness for SGHA, SCA, and SGA were 1.5 ± 1.0 cm and 25%, 2.5 ± 1.2 cm and 43%, 2.9 ± 2.0 cm and 41%, respectively (tumor size p = 0.009, SGHA vs. SGA, and invasion p; not-significant). During mean follow-up of 3.9 years, two patients (11%) developed elevated insulin-like growth factor-1 and five patients (29%) required a second surgery for tumor recurrence. Rate of surgical reintervention was similar to SCA (31%), but higher than SGA (10%) (p = 0.035, SGHA vs. SGA), and 18% underwent radiation therapy, similar to SCA (19%, p; not-significant) but higher than SGA (2.9%, p = 0.018).

conclusionThis is the largest single center study characterizing SGHA behavior with SGA and SCA control groups in a cohort of surgically resected pituitary adenomas. SGHA present mostly in young females, and should be closely followed due to their higher likelihood of recurrence and potential of progression to clinical acromegaly. We propose that a complete hormonal staining panel be routinely performed for all pituitary adenomas.

Indexed as

Gonadotropins, PituitaryAcromegalyAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPituitary NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesAdrenocorticotropic HormoneGonadotropins, PituitaryInsulin-Like Growth Factor IAcromegalyNon-functioningSilent corticotrophSilent gonadotrophSilent pituitary adenomasSilent somatotroph adenomas

Identifiers

PMID29043561
OpenAlexW2765440336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.