Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043560›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2018

Optimal timing of dopamine agonist withdrawal in patients with hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Miao Yun Xia, Xiao Hui Lou, Shao Jian Lin, Zhe Bao Wu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hyperprolactinemia in women: treatment.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pituitary · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miao Yun XiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025, Shanghai, China.
Xiao Hui LouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325200, Wenzhou, China.
Shao Jian LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025, Shanghai, China.
Zhe Bao WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025, Shanghai, China. zhebaowu@aliyun.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNRuian People's Hospital · CNRuijin Hospital · CN

Funding

Clinical Medicine Grant Support 20161407National Natural Science Foundation of China 81271523National Natural Science Foundation of China 81471392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDopamine agonists (DAs) are recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hyperprolactinemia. Generally, it is accepted that patients with hyperprolactinemia do not need lifelong medication, but the optimal timing for DA withdrawal has not been determined. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the impact of DA withdrawal on the clinical outcomes of patients with hyperprolactinemia, and to explore possible factors affecting successful DA withdrawal.

methodsThe databases of PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched up to May 2016.

resultsThe proportion of patients with persisting normoprolactinemia after DA withdrawal reached 36.6% in a random effects model (95% CI, 29.4-44.2%; I-squared: 82.5%). Data of stratified analysis showed that the success rate of drug withdrawal was high in patients using cabergoline (CAB) as the only treatment (41.2%; 95% CI 32.3-50.4%) and those using CAB over 24 months (48.7%; 95% CI 38.9-58.5%), especially in patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia (73.2%; 95% CI 55.6-87.7%). In addition, patients who received a low maintenance dose of CAB, and had a significant reduction in tumor size (over 50%) before withdrawal, were more likely to achieve success (51.5 and 49.4%, respectively).

conclusionThe success rate of DA withdrawal has increased in recent years. Further, the success rate of CAB withdrawal was higher than that of bromocriptine, especially in patients with a duration of treatment longer than 24 months. Conclusively, the probability of success was higher in patients who received low-dose CAB maintenance treatment and those who achieved a significant reduction in tumor size before withdrawal.

Indexed as

Withholding TreatmentDopamine AgonistsDrug Administration ScheduleHumansHyperprolactinemiaPituitary NeoplasmsProlactinomaTime FactorsDopamine AgonistsBromocriptineCabergolineDopamine agonistsHyperprolactinemiaProlactinomaWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID29043560
OpenAlexW2765198029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.