Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043489›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2018

Comparative transcriptome analysis of Apis mellifera antennae of workers performing different tasks.

Hongyi Nie, Shupeng Xu, Cuiqin Xie, Haiyang Geng, Yazhou Zhao, Jianghong Li, Wei-Fone Huang, Yan Lin, Zhiguo Li, Songkun Su

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongyi NieCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Shupeng XuCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Cuiqin XieCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Haiyang GengCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Yazhou ZhaoCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Jianghong LiCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Wei-Fone HuangCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Yan LinCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Zhiguo LiCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Songkun SuCollege of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China. susongkun@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Educational and scientific research program for young and middle-aged instructor of Fujian province No.JAT160161the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System No.CARS-45-KXJ3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bee is a social insect. Its colony is mainly coordinated by the chemical signals such as pheromones produced by queen or brood. Correspondingly, the worker bee developed numerous complicated olfactory sensilla in antennae for detection of these colony chemical signals and nectar/pollen signals in foraging. With the normal development of new emerged workers, young adults (nurse bee) worked in colony at the first 2-3 weeks and then followed by the foraging activity outside of the hive, which give rise to great change of the surrounding chemical signals. However, the olfactory adaption mechanism of worker bee in these processes of behavioral development is still unclear. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of gene expression in Apis mellifera antenna of newly emerged workers, nurses and foragers using transcriptome analysis. Meanwhile, we constructed experimental colonies to collect age-matched samples, which were used to determine whether task is the principal determinant of differential expression. RNA sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed that 6 and 14 genes were closely associated with nurse and forager behaviors, respectively. Furthermore, a broad dynamic range of chemosensory gene families and candidate odorant degrading enzymes were analyzed at different behavior statuses. We firstly reported genes associated with nursing/foraging behavior from antennae and the variations of expression of genes belonging to various olfactory gene families at different development stages. These results not only could contribute to elucidating the relationship between olfactory and behavior-related changes, but also provide a new perspective into the molecular mechanism underlying honey bee division of labor.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod AntennaeBeesBehavior, AnimalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingInsect ProteinsPheromonesSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeInsect ProteinsPheromonesAntennaeBehavioral developmentForaging behaviorInsect olfactionNursing behavior

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.