Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043465›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018

Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography.

Wouter M van Everdingen, Alwin Zweerink, Robin Nijveldt, Odette A E Salden, Mathias Meine, Alexander H Maass, Kevin Vernooy, Frederik J De Lange, Albert C van Rossum, Pierre Croisille and 7 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Incremental prognostic value of left atrial and biventricular feature tracking in dilated cardiomyopathy: a long-term study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Simultaneous assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using integratedJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Localized strain characterization of cardiomyopathy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy using novel 4D kinematic analysis of cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Wouter M van EverdingenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. w.m.vaneverdingen@umcutrecht.nl.
Alwin ZweerinkDepartment of Cardiology, and Institute for Cardiovascular Research (ICaR-VU), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robin NijveldtDepartment of Cardiology, and Institute for Cardiovascular Research (ICaR-VU), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Odette A E SaldenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mathias MeineDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexander H MaassDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kevin VernooyDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frederik J De LangeDepartment of Cardiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Albert C van RossumDepartment of Cardiology, and Institute for Cardiovascular Research (ICaR-VU), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pierre CroisilleUniversité Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, INSA, CNRS UMR 5520, INSERM U1206, CREATIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France.
Patrick ClarysseUniversité Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, INSA, CNRS UMR 5520, INSERM U1206, CREATIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France.
Bastiaan GeelhoedDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michiel RienstraDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Isabelle C Van GelderDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marc A VosDepartment of Medical Physiology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis P AllaartDepartment of Cardiology, and Institute for Cardiovascular Research (ICaR-VU), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten J CramerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Center for Translational Molecular Medicine 01C-203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parameters using myocardial strain analysis may predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). As the agreement between currently available strain imaging modalities is unknown, three different modalities were compared. Twenty-seven CRT-candidates, prospectively included in the MARC study, underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and echocardiographic examination. Left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain was analysed with CMR tagging (CMR-TAG), CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT), and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Basic strain values and parameters of dyssynchrony and discoordination obtained with CMR-FT and STE were compared to CMR-TAG. Agreement of CMR-FT and CMR-TAG was overall fair, while agreement between STE and CMR-TAG was often poor. For both comparisons, agreement on discoordination parameters was highest, followed by dyssynchrony and basic strain parameters. For discoordination parameters, agreement on systolic stretch index was highest, with fair intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) (CMR-FT: 0.58, STE: 0.55). ICC of septal systolic rebound stretch (SRS

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesEchocardiographyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial ContractionVentricular Function, LeftAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient SelectionCardiac resynchronization therapyDiscoordinationDyssynchronyFeature trackingMyocardial taggingSpeckle tracking echocardiographyStrain

Identifiers

PMID29043465
PMCPMC5847211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.