Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043442›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2017

Sex and gender matters : A sex-specific analysis of original articles published in the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift between 2013 and 2015.

Éva Rásky, Anja Waxenegger, Sylvia Groth, Erwin Stolz, Michel Schenouda, Andrea Berzlanovich

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03546114 (Does Gender Matter? Patient Preference in an Italian Osteopathic Clinical Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03546114 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Does Gender Matter? Patient Preference in an Italian Osteopathic Clinical Setting

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Superiore di Osteopatia di MilanoRan2018 to 2019Enrolled105ConditionsGender RoleArmsGender Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gender in Endocrine Diseases: Role of Sex Gonadal Hormones.International journal of endocrinology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Éva RáskyInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Universitaetsstraße 6/I, 8010, Graz, Austria. eva.rasky@medunigraz.at.
Anja WaxeneggerInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Universitaetsstraße 6/I, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Sylvia GrothInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Universitaetsstraße 6/I, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Erwin StolzInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Universitaetsstraße 6/I, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Michel SchenoudaInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Universitaetsstraße 6/I, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Andrea BerzlanovichFachbereich Forensische Gerontologie, Department für Gerichtsmedizin Wien, Medizinische Universität Wien, Sensengasse 2, 1090, Wien, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe variables sex and gender are significantly related to health and disease of women and men. Aiming at quality research, biomedical publications need to account for the key variables sex and gender.

methodsAll original articles published in the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift between 2013 and 2015 were extracted into a database. As a result, the 195 published articles were selected for review led by the Sex and Gender Equity in Research Guidelines (SAGER) by the European Association of Science Editors (EASE). The slightest indications of mentioning sex and/or gender were assessed by two reviewers independently from one another.

resultsOf the 195 publications 4 specified sex and/or gender in the title, and 62 in the abstract. None of the authors reported whether the variables sex and/or gender may have relevance and were taken into account in the design of the study. Of the 195 publications 48 mentioned the potential implications of sex and/or gender on the study results.

conclusionIn the time span studied most of the selected articles of this journal did not account for the variables sex and/or gender systematically or adequately. For future research the existing guidelines can help authors and editors to overcome gender bias due to inadequate methods. Applying sex and gender-sensitive methods to biomedical and health research is necessary for high quality and as a precondition for results which are generalizable and applicable to both women and men.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityPublicationsResearch DesignSex FactorsGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansQuality improvementResearchResearch quality improvement(SAGER) guideline adherence(SAGER) Guideline adherence

Identifiers

PMID29043442
PMCPMC5681613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.