ReviewGlobal cardiology science & practice2016
Systems biology: An emerging strategy for discovering novel pathogenetic mechanisms that promote cardiovascular disease.
Review in Global cardiology science & practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolomics in Pulmonary Hypertension-A Useful Tool to Provide Insights into the Dark Side of a Tricky Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Pulmonary arterial hypertension: Cellular and molecular changes in the lung.Global cardiology science & practice · 2020Review
- Systems Biology Approaches to Redox Metabolism in Stress and Disease States.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2018Review
- Lower DHEA-S levels predict disease and worse outcomes in post-menopausal women with idiopathic, connective tissue disease- and congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reductionist theory proposes that analyzing complex systems according to their most fundamental components is required for problem resolution, and has served as the cornerstone of scientific methodology for more than four centuries. However, technological gains in the current scientific era now allow for the generation of large datasets that profile the proteomic, genomic, and metabolomic signatures of biological systems across a range of conditions. The accessibility of data on such a vast scale has, in turn, highlighted the limitations of reductionism, which is not conducive to analyses that consider multiple and contemporaneous interactions between intermediates within a pathway or across constructs. Systems biology has emerged as an alternative approach to analyze complex biological systems. This methodology is based on the generation of scale-free networks and, thus, provides a quantitative assessment of relationships between multiple intermediates, such as protein-protein interactions, within and between pathways of interest. In this way, systems biology is well positioned to identify novel targets implicated in the pathogenesis or treatment of diseases. In this review, the historical root and fundamental basis of systems biology, as well as the potential applications of this methodology are discussed with particular emphasis on integration of these concepts to further understanding of cardiovascular disorders such as coronary artery disease and pulmonary hypertension.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.