ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2014
Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience.
Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiology laboratories involved in disease and antimicrobial resistance surveillance: Strengths and challenges of the central African states.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2022Review
- Evaluation of corrective actions of feedback from clinicians on Clinical Laboratory Services at Bamenda Regional Hospital Laboratory, Cameroon.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2020Article
- Maximising mentorship: Variations in laboratory mentorship models implemented in Zimbabwe.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2014Article
- Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2014Article
- A comprehensive review of the SLMTA literature part 2: Measuring success.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2014Review
- A comprehensive review of the SLMTA literature part 1: Content analysis and future priorities.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2014Review
- From grass to grace: How SLMTA revolutionised the Bamenda Regional Hospital Laboratory in Cameroon.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2014Article
- The SLMTA programme: Transforming the laboratory landscape in developing countries.African journal of laboratory medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratory system. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several laboratories travel to one location to be trained together.
objectivesWe assessed the effectiveness and cost of conducting SLMTA training in a decentralised manner as compared to centralised training.
methodsSLMTA was implemented in five pilot laboratories in Cameroon between October 2010 and October 2012 by means of a series of workshops, laboratory improvement projects and on-site mentorship. The first workshop was conducted in the traditional centralised approach. The second and third workshops were decentralised, delivered on-site at each of the five enrolled laboratories. Progress was monitored by repeated audits using the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist.
resultsAudit scores for all laboratories improved steadily through the course of the programme. Median improvement was 11 percentage points after the first (centralised) training and an additional 24 percentage points after the second (decentralised) training. The estimated per-laboratory cost of the two training models was approximately the same at US$21 000. However, in the decentralised model approximately five times as many staff members were trained, although it also required five times the amount of trainer time.
conclusionDecentralised SLMTA training was effective in improving laboratory quality and should be considered as an alternative to centralised training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.