Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043049›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Polyphagy and diversification in tussock moths: Support for the oscillation hypothesis from extreme generalists.

Houshuai Wang, Jeremy D Holloway, Niklas Janz, Mariana P Braga, Niklas Wahlberg, Min Wang, Sören Nylin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bird lineages colonizing urban habitats have diversified at high rates across deep time.Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Houshuai WangDepartment of Entomology South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Jeremy D HollowayDepartment of Life Sciences Natural History Museum London UK.
Niklas JanzDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Mariana P BragaDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1253-2536
Niklas WahlbergDepartment of Biology Laboratory of Genetics University of Turku Turku Finland.
Min WangDepartment of Entomology South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Sören NylinDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4195-8920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory on plasticity driving speciation, as applied to insect-plant interactions (the oscillation hypothesis), predicts more species in clades with higher diversity of host use, all else being equal. Previous support comes mainly from specialized herbivores such as butterflies, and plasticity theory suggests that there may be an upper host range limit where host diversity no longer promotes diversification. The tussock moths (Erebidae: Lymantriinae) are known for extreme levels of polyphagy. We demonstrate that this system is also very different from butterflies in terms of phylogenetic signal for polyphagy and for use of specific host orders. Yet we found support for the generality of the oscillation hypothesis, in that clades with higher diversity of host use were found to contain more species. These clades also consistently contained the most polyphagous single species. Comparing host use in Lymantriinae with related taxa shows that the taxon indeed stands out in terms of the frequency of polyphagous species. Comparative evidence suggests that this is most probably due to its nonfeeding adults, with polyphagy being part of a resulting life history syndrome. Our results indicate that even high levels of plasticity can drive diversification, at least when the levels oscillate over time.

Indexed as

host plant rangeLymantriinaeNymphalidaeplasticityspeciation

Identifiers

PMID29043049
PMCPMC5632610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.