Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29043014›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2017

An open-label study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of lanadelumab for prevention of attacks in hereditary angioedema: design of the HELP study extension.

Marc A Riedl, Jonathan A Bernstein, Timothy Craig, Aleena Banerji, Markus Magerl, Marco Cicardi, Hilary J Longhurst, Mustafa M Shennak, William H Yang, Jennifer Schranz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Effectiveness of lanadelumab for preventing hereditary angioedema attacks: Subgroup analyses from the HELP study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficit: the strength of recognition (51 cases).Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Marc A RiedlUniversity of California - San Diego School of Medicine, 8899 University Center Lane, Suite 230, San Diego, CA 92122 USA.
Jonathan A BernsteinDepartment of Internal Medicine/Allergy Section Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML#563, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA.
Timothy CraigDepartment of Medicine and Pediatrics, Penn State University, Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033 USA.
Aleena BanerjiDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 201, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Markus MagerlDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Marco CicardiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Luigi Sacco, University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco Milan, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Hilary J LonghurstDepartment of Immunology, Barts Health NHS Trust, 80 Newark Street, London, E1 2ES UK.
Mustafa M ShennakTriumpharma Inc., 07 Building, Al Yarooty Street, PO Box 2233, Amman, 11941 Jordan.
William H YangOttawa Allergy Research Corporation, University of Ottawa Medical School, 110-2935 Conroy Road, Ottawa, ON K1G 6C6 Canada.
Jennifer SchranzShire, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421 USA.
Jovanna BaptistaShire, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421 USA.
Paula J BusseDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th Street 11th Floor, New York, NY 10029 USA.
Takeda (United States) · USASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent attacks of subcutaneous or submucosal edema. Attacks are unpredictable, debilitating, and have a significant impact on quality of life. Patients may be prescribed prophylactic therapy to prevent angioedema attacks. Current prophylactic treatments may be difficult to administer (i.e., intravenously), require frequent administrations or are not well tolerated, and breakthrough attacks may still occur frequently. Lanadelumab is a subcutaneously-administered monoclonal antibody inhibitor of plasma kallikrein in clinical development for prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema attacks. A Phase 1b study supported its efficacy in preventing attacks. A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm study has been completed and an open-label extension is currently ongoing. METHODS/

designThe primary objective of the open-label extension is to evaluate the long-term safety of repeated subcutaneous administrations of lanadelumab in patients with type I/II HAE. Secondary objectives include evaluation of efficacy and time to first angioedema attack to determine outer bounds of the dosing interval. The study will also evaluate immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, quality of life, characteristics of breakthrough attacks, ease of self-administration, and safety/efficacy in patients who switch to lanadelumab from another prophylactic therapy. The open-label extension will enroll patients who completed the double-blind study ("rollover patients") and those who did not participate in the double-blind study ("non-rollover patients"), which includes patients who may or may not be currently using another prophylactic therapy. Rollover patients will receive a single 300 mg dose of lanadelumab on Day 0 and the second dose after the patient's first confirmed angioedema attack. Thereafter, lanadelumab will be administered every 2 weeks. Non-rollover patients will receive 300 mg lanadelumab every 2 weeks regardless of the first attack. All patients will receive their last dose on Day 350 (maximum of 26 doses), and will then undergo a 4-week follow-up. DISCUSSION: Prevention of attacks can reduce the burden of illness associated with HAE. Prophylactic therapy requires extended, repeated dosing and the results of this study will provide important data on the long-term safety and efficacy of lanadelumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of plasma kallikrein for subcutaneous administration for the treatment of HAE.

Indexed as

BradykininC1-inhibitorHereditary angioedemaLanadelumabMonoclonal antibodyOrphan diseasePlasma kallikreinProphylaxisRare disease

Identifiers

PMID29043014
PMCPMC5629784
OpenAlexW2763884924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.