ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Nalbuphine analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy during the perioperative period.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine on Stress Response and Postoperative Delirium of Older Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Trial
- A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Trial
- Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine-Nalbuphine Combination vs. Dexmedetomidine Alone in Donkeys Undergoing Field Castration under Total Intravenous Anesthesia.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Review
- Impact of intravenous administration of nalbuphine at different time points for postoperative analgesia and sedation in adenotonsillectomized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2023Article
- Nalbuphine alleviates inflammation by down-regulating NF-κB in an acute inflammatory visceral pain rat model.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2022Article
- ED50 of Propofol Combined with Nalbuphine on the Sedative Effect in Painless Hysteroscopy.Pain and therapy · 2021Article
- The effect of anesthesia on the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery open science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to investigate the analgesic effects of nalbuphine on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy during the perioperative period, as well as its effects on inflammatory cytokines. We selected 92 patients with early lung cancer who were admitted to Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital between January 2016 and December 2016. The patients were randomly divided into control and observation groups (n=46 each). All patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, with those in the observation group receiving intravenous nalbuphine hydrochloride prior to induction (the control group received saline). Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and anesthetic dosages were compared between groups. The analgesic effects during the perioperative period were compared using a visual analogue scale. The adverse effects of anesthetics (nausea, vomiting, dizziness and drowsiness) were compared between the two groups. Finally, serum inflammatory cytokine [tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10] levels were measured using ELISA at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days after operation. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (p>0.05). However, dosages of propofol and remifentanil used were lower in the observation group than in the control group (p<0.05), and the effective rate of postoperative analgesia in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p<0.05). The degree of postoperative pain in both groups were lower than preoperative rates (p<0.05), while the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (p<0.05). Finally, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 levels were significantly lower in the observation group relative to the control group at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days after operation (p<0.05). Therefore, nalbuphine has a significant analgesic effect during thoracoscopic lobectomy. The application of nalbuphine can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, reduce postoperative inflammatory responses, and promote rapid patient recovery, thus demonstrating the clinical value of nalbuphine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.