Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29042791›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2017

Profile of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure: patient selection and perspectives.

Srikanth Yandrapalli, Gabriela Andries, Medha Biswas, Sahil Khera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acute on chronic heart failure-Which variations on B-type natriuretic peptide levels?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srikanth YandrapalliDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Gabriela AndriesDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Medha BiswasDivision of Cardiology, New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Sahil KheraDivision of Cardiology, New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Westchester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an estimated prevalence of 5.8 million in the USA and over 23 million people worldwide, heart failure (HF) is growing in epidemic proportions. Despite the use of guideline-directed medical therapies such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for chronic systolic HF for almost two decades, HF remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditures. The Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial provided compelling evidence for the cardiovascular and mortality benefit of sacubitril/valsartan when compared to enalapril in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sacubitril/valsartan performed better than enalapril across various HFrEF patient characteristics and showed substantial benefit in patients with other common comorbidities. Following the trial, the US Food and Drug Administration approved this drug for the treatment of HF. Various international HF consensus guidelines endorse sacubitril/valsartan as a class I recommendation for the management of symptomatic HFrEF. Although this high-quality clinical study is the largest and the most globally represented trial in HFrEF patients, concerns have been raised regarding the generalizability of the trial results in real-world HF population. The gaps in US Food and Drug Administration labeling and guideline recommendations might lead to this medication being used in a larger population than it was studied in. In this review, we will discuss the current role of sacubitril/valsartan in the management of HF, concerns related to PARADIGM-HF and answers, shortcomings of this novel drug, effects on patient characteristics, real-world eligibility, and the role of ongoing and further investigations to clarify the profile of sacubitril/valsartan in the management of HF.

Indexed as

AminobutyratesAngiotensin II Type 2 Receptor BlockersBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsHeart FailureHumansNeprilysinPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicProtease InhibitorsRisk FactorsTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeValsartanAminobutyratesAngiotensin II Type 2 Receptor BlockersBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsNeprilysinProtease Inhibitorssacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanangiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorEntrestoHFrEFLCZ696sacubitril/valsartansystolic heart failure

Identifiers

PMID29042791
PMCPMC5634378
OpenAlexW2763343438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.