Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29042656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A new mode of contrast in biological second harmonic generation microscopy.

Nicola H Green, Robin M Delaine-Smith, Hannah J Askew, Robert Byers, Gwendolen C Reilly, Stephen J Matcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola H GreenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, North Campus, Broad Lane, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HQ, UK. n.h.green@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5413-0642
Robin M Delaine-SmithDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, North Campus, Broad Lane, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HQ, UK.
Hannah J AskewDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, North Campus, Broad Lane, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HQ, UK.
Robert ByersThe School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Gwendolen C ReillyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, North Campus, Broad Lane, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-1071
Stephen J MatcherThe School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBAdvanced Manufacturing Research Centre · GBInsigneo · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced image contrast in biological second harmonic imaging microscopy (SHIM) has previously been reported via quantitative assessments of forward- to epi-generated signal intensity ratio and by polarization analysis. Here we demonstrate a new form of contrast: the material-specific, wavelength-dependence of epi-generated second harmonic generation (SHG) excitation efficiency, and discriminate collagen and myosin by ratiometric epi-generated SHG images at 920 nm and 860 nm. Collagen shows increased SHG intensity at 920 nm, while little difference is detected between the two for myosin; allowing SHIM to characterize different SHG-generating components within a complex biological sample. We propose that momentum-space mapping of the second-order non-linear structure factor is the source of this contrast and develop a model for the forward and epi-generated SHG wavelength-dependence. Our model demonstrates that even very small changes in the assumed material fibrillar structure can produce large changes in the wavelength-dependency of epi-generated SHG. However, in the case of forward SHG, although the same changes impact upon absolute intensity at a given wavelength, they have very little effect on wavelength-dependency beyond the expected monotonic fall. We also propose that this difference between forward and epi-generated SHG provides an explanation for many of the wavelength-dependency discrepancies in the published literature.

Indexed as

CollagenDermisFibroblastsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSecond Harmonic Generation MicroscopyCollagen

Identifiers

PMID29042656
PMCPMC5645342
OpenAlexW2761508560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.