Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29042552›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Mass spectrometry sequencing of long digital polymers facilitated by programmed inter-byte fragmentation.

Abdelaziz Al Ouahabi, Jean-Arthur Amalian, Laurence Charles, Jean-François Lutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reticular Frameworks for Advanced Polymer Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Photo-editable macromolecular information.Nature communications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdelaziz Al OuahabiUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Institut Charles Sadron UPR22, 23 rue du Loess, 67034, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Arthur AmalianAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, UMR 7273, Institute of Radical Chemistry, 13397, Marseille, France.
Laurence CharlesAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, UMR 7273, Institute of Radical Chemistry, 13397, Marseille, France. laurence.charles@univ-amu.fr.
Jean-François LutzUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Institut Charles Sadron UPR22, 23 rue du Loess, 67034, Strasbourg, France. jflutz@unistra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3893-2458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of data storage miniaturization, it was recently shown that digital information can be stored in the monomer sequences of non-natural macromolecules. However, the sequencing of such digital polymers is currently limited to short chains. Here, we report that intact multi-byte digital polymers can be sequenced in a moderate resolution mass spectrometer and that full sequence coverage can be attained without requiring pre-analysis digestion or the help of sequence databases. In order to do so, the polymers are designed to undergo controlled fragmentations in collision-induced dissociation conditions. Each byte of the sequence is labeled by an identification tag and a weak alkoxyamine group is placed between 2 bytes. As a consequence of this design, the NO-C bonds break first upon collisional activation, thus leading to a pattern of mass tag-shifted intact bytes. Afterwards, each byte is individually sequenced in pseudo-MS

Identifiers

PMID29042552
PMCPMC5645402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.