ArticlemBio2017
Unintended Laboratory-Driven Evolution Reveals Genetic Requirements for Biofilm Formation by
Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of Juglone as a Natural Extract for Inhibiting SRB-Induced Corrosion of Q235 Steel in Seawater.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Structural analyses uncover protease-adhesin interactions and c-di-GMP receptor regulation in sulfate-reducing bacteria.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Absence of biofilm adhesin proteins changes surface attachment and cell strategy forJournal of bacteriology · 2025Article
- Anti-Biofilm Effects of Z102-E ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reconstitution of a biofilm adhesin system from a sulfate-reducing bacterium inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Reconstitution of a Biofilm Adhesin System from a Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- HmBio · 2023Article
- Large-scale genetic characterization of the model sulfate-reducing bacterium,Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Deletion Mutants, Archived Transposon Library, and Tagged Protein Constructs of the Model Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021Article
- Gene Sets and Mechanisms of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Biofilm Formation and Quorum Sensing With Impact on Corrosion.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Novel Mode of Molybdate Inhibition ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans IC1, a Sulfonate-Respiring Anaerobe.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Type 1 Does the Two-Step: Type 1 Secretion Substrates with a Functional Periplasmic Intermediate.Journal of bacteriology · 2018Review
- An N-Terminal Retention Module Anchors the Giant Adhesin LapA of Pseudomonas fluorescens at the Cell Surface: a Novel Subfamily of Type I Secretion Systems.Journal of bacteriology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofilms of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are of particular interest as members of this group are culprits in corrosion of industrial metal and concrete pipelines as well as being key players in subsurface metal cycling. Yet the mechanism of biofilm formation by these bacteria has not been determined. Here we show that two supposedly identical wild-type cultures of the SRB
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.