Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29042380›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Potentially inappropriate prescribing and its association with health outcomes in middle-aged people: a prospective cohort study in Ireland.

Frank Moriarty, Caitriona Cahir, Kathleen Bennett, Carmel M Hughes, Rose Anne Kenny, Tom Fahey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a repeated cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frank MoriartyHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Caitriona CahirDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Kathleen BennettDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Carmel M HughesHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Rose Anne KennyThe Irish Longitundinal Study on Ageing, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Tom FaheyHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEQueen's University Belfast · GBTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in a cohort of community-dwelling middle-aged people and assess the relationship between PIP and emergency department (ED) visits, general practitioner (GP) visits and quality of life (QoL).

designProspective cohort study.

settingThe Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), a nationally representative cohort study of ageing.

participantsIndividuals aged 45-64 years recruited to TILDA who were eligible for the means-tested General Medical Services scheme and followed up after 2 years. EXPOSURE: PIP was determined in the 12 months preceding baseline and follow-up TILDA data collection by applying the PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People's Treatments (PROMPT) criteria to participants' medication dispensing data. OUTCOME MEASURES: At follow-up, the reported rates of ED and GP visits over 12 months (primary outcome) and the CASP-R12 (Control Autonomy Self-realisation Pleasure) measure of QoL (secondary outcome). ANALYSIS: Multivariate negative binomial (rates) and linear regression (CASP-R12) models controlling for potential confounders.

resultsAt 2-year follow-up (n=808), PIP was detected in 42.9% by the PROMPT criteria. An ED visit was reported by 18.7% and 94.4% visited a GP (median 4 visits, IQR 2-6). Exposure to ≥2 PROMPT criteria was associated with higher rates of healthcare utilisation and lower QoL in unadjusted regression. However, in multivariate analysis, the associations between PIP and rates of ED visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.58), and GP visits (IRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.28), and CASP-R12 score (adjusted β coefficient 0.35, 95% CI -0.93 to 1.64) were not statistically significant. Numbers of medicines and comorbidities were associated with higher healthcare utilisation.

conclusionsAlthough PIP was prevalent in this study population, there was no evidence of a relationship with ED and GP visits and QoL. Further research should evaluate whether the PROMPT criteria are related to these and other adverse outcomes in the general middle-aged population.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDepressionDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingIrelandLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrevalenceProspective StudiesHealth Care UtilisationPotentially Inappropriate PrescribingPrimary CarePrompt CriteriaQuality Of Life

Identifiers

PMID29042380
PMCPMC5652466
OpenAlexW2765826682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.