Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29042260›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2018

PLDT (planarian light/dark test): an invertebrate assay to quantify defensive responding and study anxiety-like effects.

Ashenafi Mebratu Zewde, Frances Yu, Sunil Nayak, Christopher Tallarida, Allen B Reitz, Lynn G Kirby, Scott M Rawls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing the Welfare of Captive Group-Housed Cockroaches,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Planarian nociception: Lessons from a scrunching flatworm.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. FG 7142: is this validated tool to study anxiety now forgotten?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashenafi Mebratu ZewdeCenter for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Frances YuCenter for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sunil NayakCenter for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher TallaridaCenter for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Allen B ReitzFox Chase Chemical Diversity Center, Doylestown, PA, USA.
Lynn G KirbyCenter for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Anatomy, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scott M RawlsCenter for Substance Abuse Research, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: scott.rawls@temple.edu.

Funding

Pilot Projects Core (PPC)P30DA013429 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Anjali M Rajadhyaksha · 2000 to 2026
$34.6M
Planarians and the pharmacology of addiction: an in vivo model for K-12 educationR25DA033270 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI RAWLS, SCOTT M. · 2014 to 2017
$1.0M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA013429NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA033270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlanarians, like rodents, instinctively spend more time in dark versus light environments when given a choice. This behavioral phenomenon is called negative phototaxis, which may reflect defensive responding related to an anxiety-like phenotype. NEW

methodWe propose a planarian light/dark test, designated PLDT, to predict anxiogenic- or anxiolytic-like effects. Experimentally, we placed a planarian at the midline of a Petri dish, containing test compound or water, that was split evenly into light and dark compartments and determined time spent in the light over 10min.

resultsA clinically-approved benzodiazepine agonist (clorazepate; 10μM) increased time spent in the light whereas an inverse benzodiazepine agonist (FG-7142; 1, 10μM) produced the opposite response. Fluoxetine (1μM) or ethanol (1%), as well as the 'bath salt' cathinone S-mephedrone (300μM), enhanced time spent in the light. Planarians exposed to predator (frog) odor spent more time in the dark. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsThe light/dark box (LDB) test in rodents is used to screen putative medications for possible anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects. Our results showing that time spent in the light by planarians is enhanced by common anxiety-relieving drugs (e.g. benzodiazepine agonist, ethanol, fluoxetine) and decreased by anxiogenic substances (e.g. predator odor, benzodiazepine inverse agonist) reveal directionally similar effects in the established (LDB) and new (PLDT) assays.

conclusionOur data identify the PLDT as a cost-effective, invertebrate assay for quantifying the effects of practically any water-soluble substance on defensive responding and for studying and teaching anxiety-like responses in a living organism.

Indexed as

AnxietyBehavior, AnimalModels, AnimalPlanariansAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBenzodiazepinesCarbolinesDarknessDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolFluoxetineLightingMethamphetamineOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionBenzodiazepinesCarbolinesEthanolFG 7142FluoxetinemephedroneMethamphetaminePsychotropic DrugsAnxietyBenzodiazepineCarbolineCathinoneClorazepateFluoxetineInvertebrateMephedronePlanarian

Identifiers

PMID29042260
PMCPMC5705295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.