Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29041977›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2017

Perceptions of and barriers to family planning services in the poorest regions of Chiapas, Mexico: a qualitative study of men, women, and adolescents.

Emily Dansereau, Alexandra Schaefer, Bernardo Hernández, Jennifer Nelson, Erin Palmisano, Diego Ríos-Zertuche, Alex Woldeab, Maria Paola Zúñiga, Emma Margarita Iriarte, Ali H Mokdad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emily DansereauInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2301 5th AVE, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA. edanse@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8075-239X
Alexandra SchaeferInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2301 5th AVE, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Bernardo HernándezInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2301 5th AVE, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Jennifer NelsonSalud Mesoamerica Initiative, Inter-American Development Bank, Panama City, Panama.
Erin PalmisanoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2301 5th AVE, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Diego Ríos-ZertucheSalud Mesoamerica Initiative, Inter-American Development Bank, Panama City, Panama.
Alex WoldeabInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2301 5th AVE, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Maria Paola ZúñigaSalud Mesoamerica Initiative, Inter-American Development Bank, Panama City, Panama.
Emma Margarita IriarteSalud Mesoamerica Initiative, Inter-American Development Bank, Panama City, Panama.
Ali H MokdadInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2301 5th AVE, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Charbel El BcheraouiInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2301 5th AVE, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the poorest regions of Chiapas, Mexico, 50.2% of women in need of contraceptives do not use any modern method. A qualitative study was needed to design effective and culturally appropriate interventions.

methodsWe used purposive maximum-variation sampling to select eight municipalities with a high proportion of residents in the poorest wealth quintile, including urban, rural, indigenous, and non-indigenous communities. We conducted 44 focus group discussions with 292 women, adolescent women, and men using semi-structured topic guides. We analyzed the data through recursive abstraction.

resultsThere were intergenerational and cultural gaps in the acceptability of family planning, and in some communities family planning use was greatly limited by gender roles and religious objections to contraception. Men strongly influenced family planning choices in many households, but were largely unreached by outreach and education programs due to their work hours. Respondents were aware of many modern methods but often lacked deeper knowledge and held misconceptions about long-term fertility risks posed by some hormonal methods. Acute physical side effects also dissuaded use. The implant was a new and highly acceptable method due to ease of use, low upkeep, and minimal side effects; however, it was perceived as subject to stock-outs. Adolescent women reported being refused services at health facilities and requested more reproductive health information from their parents and schools. Mass and social media are growing sources of reproductive health information.

conclusionsOur study identifies a number of barriers to family planning that have yet to be adequately addressed by existing programs in Chiapas' poorest regions, and calls for reinvigorated efforts to provide effective, acceptable, and culturally appropriate interventions for these communities.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthFamily Planning ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerceptionAdolescentContraceptionFemaleHumansMalePovertyQualitative ResearchRural PopulationChiapasContraceptionFamily planningMexicoQualitative

Identifiers

PMID29041977
PMCPMC5646150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.