Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29041947›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Ben Darlow, James Stanley, Sarah Dean, J Haxby Abbott, Sue Garrett, Fiona Mathieson, Anthony Dowell

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ben DarlowDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. ben.darlow@otago.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6814
James StanleyBiostatistical Group, Dean's Department, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sarah DeanMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
J Haxby AbbottDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sue GarrettDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Fiona MathiesonDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Anthony DowellDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is a major health issue associated with considerable health loss and societal costs. General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in the management of LBP; however, GP care has not been shown to be the most cost-effective approach unless exercise and behavioural counselling are added to usual care. The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to LBP has been developed to assist GPs to manage LBP by empowering exploration and management of psychosocial barriers to recovery and provision of evidence-based care and information. The aim of the Low Back Pain in General Practice (LBPinGP) trial is to explore whether patients with LBP who receive care from GPs trained in the FREE approach have better outcomes than those who receive usual care. METHODS/

designThis is a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial comparing the FREE approach with usual care for LBP management with investigator-blinded assessment of outcomes. GPs will be recruited and then cluster randomised (in practice groups) to the intervention or control arm. Intervention arm GPs will receive training in the FREE approach, and control arm GPs will continue to practice as usual. Patients presenting to their GP with a primary complaint of LBP will be allocated on the basis of allocation of the GP they consult. We aim to recruit 60 GPs and 275 patients (assuming patients are recruited from 75% of GPs and an average of 5 patients per GP complete the study, accounting for 20% patient participant dropout). Patient participants and the trial statistician will be blind to group allocation throughout the study. Analyses will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome will be back-related functional impairment 6 months post-initial LBP consultation (interim data at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months), measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary patient outcomes include pain, satisfaction, quality of life, days off from work and costs of care. Secondary GP outcomes include beliefs about pain and impairment, GP confidence, and actual and reported clinical behaviour. Health economic and process evaluations will be conducted. DISCUSSION: In the LBPinGP trial, we will investigate providing an intervention during the first interaction a person with back pain has with their GP. Because the FREE approach is used within a normal GP consultation, if effective, it may be a cost-effective means of improving LBP care.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000888460 . Registered on 6 July 2016.

Indexed as

FearClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessDisability EvaluationExercise TherapyGeneral PracticeHealth Care CostsHumansLow Back PainNew ZealandPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionBrief interventionCost-effectivenessGeneral practiceHealth-related quality of lifeImpairmentIntervention studyLow back painPrimary careRCTTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID29041947
PMCPMC5646107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.