Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29040910›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2018

Intensity inhomogeneity correction of SD-OCT data using macular flatspace.

Andrew Lang, Aaron Carass, Bruno M Jedynak, Sharon D Solomon, Peter A Calabresi, Jerry L Prince

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew LangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. Electronic address: lang@jhu.edu.
Aaron CarassDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Department of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. Electronic address: aaron_carass@jhu.edu.
Bruno M JedynakDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA. Electronic address: bruno.jedynak@pdx.edu.
Sharon D SolomonDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: ssolomon1@jhmi.edu.
Peter A CalabresiDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: pcalabr1@jhmi.edu.
Jerry L PrinceDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. Electronic address: prince@jhu.edu.

Funding

3D segmentation and registration of macular SD-OCT for application in MSR01EY024655 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Coupled level set framework for retinal segmentation and atlasing in SD-OCTR21EY022150 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2012 to 2013
$420k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024655NEI NIH HHS R21 EY022150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Images of the retina acquired using optical coherence tomography (OCT) often suffer from intensity inhomogeneity problems that degrade both the quality of the images and the performance of automated algorithms utilized to measure structural changes. This intensity variation has many causes, including off-axis acquisition, signal attenuation, multi-frame averaging, and vignetting, making it difficult to correct the data in a fundamental way. This paper presents a method for inhomogeneity correction by acting to reduce the variability of intensities within each layer. In particular, the N3 algorithm, which is popular in neuroimage analysis, is adapted to work for OCT data. N3 works by sharpening the intensity histogram, which reduces the variation of intensities within different classes. To apply it here, the data are first converted to a standardized space called macular flat space (MFS). MFS allows the intensities within each layer to be more easily normalized by removing the natural curvature of the retina. N3 is then run on the MFS data using a modified smoothing model, which improves the efficiency of the original algorithm. We show that our method more accurately corrects gain fields on synthetic OCT data when compared to running N3 on non-flattened data. It also reduces the overall variability of the intensities within each layer, without sacrificing contrast between layers, and improves the performance of registration between OCT images.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAutomationHumansMacula LuteaRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceIntensity inhomogeneity correctionMacular flatspaceOptical coherence tomographyRegistrationRetina

Identifiers

PMID29040910
PMCPMC6311386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.