Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29040820›Full record

SynthesisJournal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN2018

Systematic Review of the Effect of Enteral Feeding on Gut Microbiota in Preterm Infants.

Wanli Xu, Michelle P Judge, Kendra Maas, Naveed Hussain, Jacqueline M McGrath, Wendy A Henderson, Xiaomei Cong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of mother's own milkMicrobiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Overview on In Vitro Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Dynamics of the preterm gut microbiome in health and disease.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wanli Xu
Michelle P Judge
Kendra Maas
Naveed Hussain
Jacqueline M McGrath
Wendy A Henderson
Xiaomei Cong

Funding

Symptom Distress Mechanisms in Digestive DisordersZIANR000018 · NINR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH · PI HENDERSON, WENDY · 2009 to 2019
$5.2M
Multi-Omics Analysis of Pain/Stress Impact on Neurodevelopment in Preterm InfantsR01NR016928 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI CONG, XIAOMEI SOPHIA · 2017 to 2020
$2.5M
Early Life Experience Imprints Gut Microbiome in Preterm InfantsK23NR014674 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI CONG, XIAOMEI SOPHIA · 2013 to 2015
$396k
NINR NIH HHS K23 NR014674NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effect of feeding type on microbial patterns among preterm infants and to identify feeding factors that promote the colonization of beneficial bacteria. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and the Cummulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature were thoroughly searched for articles published between January 2000 and January 2017, using the keywords gut microbiome, gut microbiota, enteral microbiome, enteral microbiota, premature infant, preterm infant, extremely low birth weight infant, ELBW infant, very low birth weight infant, feeding, breast milk, breastfeeding, formula, prebiotic, probiotic, and long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid. STUDY SELECTION: Primary studies written in English and focused on the association between enteral feeding and gut microbiome patterns of preterm infants were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION: We independently reviewed the selected articles and extracted information using predefined data extraction criteria including study design, study participants, type of feeding, type and frequency of biospecimen (e.g., feces, gastric aspirate) collection, microbiological analysis method, and major results. DATA SYNTHESIS: In 4 of the 18 studies included in the review, researchers described the effects of milk products (mothers' own milk, donor human milk, and formula). In 5 studies, the effects of prebiotics were assessed, and in 9 studies, the effects of probiotics on the gut microbiome were described. Mothers' own breast milk feeding influenced the compositional structure of preterm infants' gut microbial community and increased diversity of gut microbiota compared with donor human milk and formula feeding. The results of the use of prebiotics and probiotics varied among studies; however, the majority of the researchers reported positive bifidogenic effects on the development of beneficial bacteria.

conclusionMothers' own milk is considered the best form of nutrition for preterm infants and the gut microbial community. Variation in fatty acid composition across infant feeding types can affect microbial composition. The evidence for supplementation of prebiotics and probiotics to promote the gut microbial community structure is compelling; however, additional research is needed in this area.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureEnteral NutritionHumansInfant, NewbornMilk, HumanProbioticsdonor human milkfeedingformulalong-chain polyunsaturated fatty acidsmicrobiomemother’s own milkprebioticsprobioticssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29040820
PMCPMC5899689
OpenAlexW2763950031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.