Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29040609›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Improving patient safety and efficiency of medication reconciliation through the development and adoption of a computer-assisted tool with automated electronic integration of population-based community drug data: the RightRx project.

Robyn Tamblyn, Nancy Winslade, Todd C Lee, Aude Motulsky, Ari Meguerditchian, Melissa Bustillo, Sarah Elsayed, David L Buckeridge, Isabelle Couture, Christina J Qian and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Electronic medication reconciliation in hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Medication Use Quality and Safety in Older Adults: 2019 Update.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Implementation and sustainability of a medication reconciliation toolkit: A mixed methods evaluation.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2020
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Easy Medication Reconciliation at Hospital Admission: The EzMedRec Decision Support System.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Robyn TamblynDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Nancy WinsladeDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Todd C LeeDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Aude MotulskyDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Ari MeguerditchianDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Melissa BustilloClinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Sarah ElsayedClinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
David L BuckeridgeDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Isabelle CoutureMcGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada.
Christina J QianClinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Teresa MoragaClinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Allen HuangDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Many countries require hospitals to implement medication reconciliation for accreditation, but the process is resource-intensive, thus adherence is poor. We report on the impact of prepopulating and aligning community and hospital drug lists with data from population-based and hospital-based drug information systems to reduce workload and enhance adoption and use of an e-medication reconciliation application, RightRx. Methods: The prototype e-medical reconciliation web-based software was developed for a cluster-randomized trial at the McGill University Health Centre. User-centered design and agile development processes were used to develop features intended to enhance adoption, safety, and efficiency. RightRx was implemented in medical and surgical wards, with support and training provided by unit champions and field staff. The time spent per professional using RightRx was measured, as well as the medication reconciliation completion rates in the intervention and control units during the first 20 months of the trial. Results: Users identified required modifications to the application, including the need for dose-based prescribing, the role of the discharge physician in prescribing community-based medication, and access to the rationale for medication decisions made during hospitalization. In the intervention units, both physicians and pharmacists were involved in discharge reconciliation, for 96.1% and 71.9% of patients, respectively. Medication reconciliation was completed for 80.7% (surgery) to 96.0% (medicine) of patients in the intervention units, and 0.7% (surgery) to 82.7% of patients in the control units. The odds of completing medication reconciliation were 9 times greater in the intervention compared to control units (odds ratio: 9.0, 95% confidence interval, 7.4-10.9, P < .0001) after adjusting for differences in patient characteristics. Conclusion: High rates of medication reconciliation completion were achieved with automated prepopulation and alignment of community and hospital medication lists.

Indexed as

Clinical Pharmacy Information SystemsMedical Record LinkageSoftwareAdultAgedCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleFormularies as TopicHumansMaleMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPharmacy Service, HospitalQuebec

Identifiers

PMID29040609
PMCPMC6018649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.