SynthesisEuropean heart journal2018
Beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: an individual patient-level analysis of double-blind randomized trials.
Synthesis in European heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 292 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
292 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 630 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of β-Blocker Therapy on Peak VOAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Pooled it
- Beta-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Differential cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan, omecamtiv mecarbil, and vericiguat across heart failure phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Beta-blockers for secondary prevention following myocardial infarction in patients without reduced ejection fraction or heart failure: an updated meta-analysis.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Anti-bradycardia pacing-impact on patients with HFpEF: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF score for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Efficacy of Antiarrhythmics in the Pharmacological Cardioversion of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023Pooled it
- Left bundle branch area pacing in mildly reduced heart failure: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Characteristics and long-term prognosis of patients with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: A systemic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of arotinolol on chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Redefining β-blocker response in heart failure patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: a machine learning cluster analysis.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Myeloperoxidase inhibition with mitiperstat in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: a randomized phase 2b trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Calcium Channel Blockade Versus β-Blockade for Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- Adaptive blood pressure-modulated atrial pacing in hypertensive HFpEF patients: a randomized, first-in-human study.ESC heart failure · 2026Trial
- Withdrawal of heart failure therapy after atrial fibrillation rhythm control with ejection fraction normalization: the WITHDRAW-AF trial.European heart journal · 2026Trial
- Low-dose digoxin improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure, preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation - the RATE-AF randomized trial.European journal of heart failure · 2025Trial
- Beta-blocker use and mortality among patients with systolic heart failure and pacemaker rhythm.ESC heart failure · 2023Trial
- Discriminative Role of Invasive Left Heart Catheterization in Patients Suspected of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Trial
- Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with acute heart failure with a supranormal left ventricular ejection fraction.European journal of heart failure · 2023Trial
- Effects of luseogliflozin on estimated plasma volume in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2022Trial
232 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Recent guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40-49% should be managed similar to LVEF ≥ 50%. We investigated the effect of beta-blockers according to LVEF in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Methods and results: Individual patient data meta-analysis of 11 trials, stratified by baseline LVEF and heart rhythm (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT0083244; PROSPERO: CRD42014010012). Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death over 1.3 years median follow-up, with an intention-to-treat analysis. For 14 262 patients in sinus rhythm, median LVEF was 27% (interquartile range 21-33%), including 575 patients with LVEF 40-49% and 244 ≥ 50%. Beta-blockers reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to placebo in sinus rhythm, an effect that was consistent across LVEF strata, except for those in the small subgroup with LVEF ≥ 50%. For LVEF 40-49%, death occurred in 21/292 [7.2%] randomized to beta-blockers compared to 35/283 [12.4%] with placebo; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-1.03]. Cardiovascular death occurred in 13/292 [4.5%] with beta-blockers and 26/283 [9.2%] with placebo; adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.97). Over a median of 1.0 years following randomization (n = 4601), LVEF increased with beta-blockers in all groups in sinus rhythm except LVEF ≥50%. For patients in atrial fibrillation at baseline (n = 3050), beta-blockers increased LVEF when < 50% at baseline, but did not improve prognosis. Conclusion: Beta-blockers improve LVEF and prognosis for patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm with a reduced LVEF. The data are most robust for LVEF < 40%, but similar benefit was observed in the subgroup of patients with LVEF 40-49%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.