Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29040434›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Differential Processing of Isolated Object and Multi-item Pop-Out Displays in LIP and PFC.

Ethan M Meyers, Andy Liang, Fumi Katsuki, Christos Constantinidis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Task and stimulus coding in the multiple-demand network.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  3. NeuroDecodeR: a package for neural decoding in R.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A One-Shot Shift from Explore to Exploit in Monkey Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Accumulators, Neurons, and Response Time.Trends in neurosciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ethan M MeyersCenter for Brains, Minds and Machines, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andy LiangCenter for Brains, Minds and Machines, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Fumi KatsukiDepartment of Psychiatry, VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, West Roxbury, MA, USA.
Christos ConstantinidisDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

CORTICAL CIRCUIT BASIS OF VISUAL SPATIAL PROCESSINGR01EY016773 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CONSTANTINIDIS, CHRISTOS · 2008 to 2017
$2.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objects that are highly distinct from their surroundings appear to visually "pop-out." This effect is present for displays in which: (1) a single cue object is shown on a blank background, and (2) a single cue object is highly distinct from surrounding objects; it is generally assumed that these 2 display types are processed in the same way. To directly examine this, we applied a decoding analysis to neural activity recorded from the lateral intraparietal (LIP) area and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Our analyses showed that for the single-object displays, cue location information appeared earlier in LIP than in dlPFC. However, for the display with distractors, location information was substantially delayed in both brain regions, and information first appeared in dlPFC. Additionally, we see that pattern of neural activity is similar for both types of displays and across different color transformations of the stimuli, indicating that location information is being coded in the same way regardless of display type. These results lead us to hypothesize that 2 different pathways are involved processing these 2 types of pop-out displays.

Indexed as

AnimalsColor PerceptionMacaca mulattaMaleNeural PathwaysNeuronsParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexSpace Perception

Identifiers

PMID29040434
PMCPMC6188570
OpenAlexW2761094724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.