ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Compound image segmentation of published biomedical figures.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid multi-panel image segmentation framework for improved medical image retrieval system.PloS one · 2025Article
- EXSCLAIM!: Harnessing materials science literature for self-labeled microscopy datasets.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Enhancing biomedical search interfaces with images.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Compound Figure Separation of Biomedical Images: Mining Large Datasets for Self-supervised Learning.The journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging · 2022Article
- Utilizing image and caption information for biomedical document classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Figure and caption extraction from biomedical documents.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Images convey essential information in biomedical publications. As such, there is a growing interest within the bio-curation and the bio-databases communities, to store images within publications as evidence for biomedical processes and for experimental results. However, many of the images in biomedical publications are compound images consisting of multiple panels, where each individual panel potentially conveys a different type of information. Segmenting such images into constituent panels is an essential first step toward utilizing images. Results: In this article, we develop a new compound image segmentation system, FigSplit, which is based on Connected Component Analysis. To overcome shortcomings typically manifested by existing methods, we develop a quality assessment step for evaluating and modifying segmentations. Two methods are proposed to re-segment the images if the initial segmentation is inaccurate. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our method compared with other methods. Availability and implementation: The system is publicly available for use at: https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~compbio/FigSplit. The code is available upon request. Contact: shatkay@udel.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available online at Bioinformatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.