Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29040364›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2018

Preliminary 3-Year Evaluation of Experience With SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva Silicone Breast Implants: A Single-Center Experience With 5813 Consecutive Breast Augmentation Cases.

Marcos Sforza, Renato Zaccheddu, Angelo Alleruzzo, Adriano Seno, Domenico Mileto, Arnaldo Paganelli, Hassan Sulaiman, Michael Payne, Lajos Maurovich-Horvat

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcos SforzaProf. Sforza is responsible for the elective internship in plastic surgery, Dolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Renato ZacchedduDolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Angelo AlleruzzoDolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Adriano SenoDolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Domenico MiletoDolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Arnaldo PaganelliDolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Hassan SulaimanDolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Michael PayneDolan Park Hospital, Bromsgrove, UK.
Lajos Maurovich-HorvatUniversity College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBDolan Park Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilicone breast implants have been in use for breast augmentation for more than 50 years, but technological innovation has been lacking in implant design until recently.

objectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the complication and reoperation rates following breast augmentation utilizing the Motiva silicone breast implants.

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated the safety of Motiva implants in 5813 consecutive cases of breast augmentation. Implants with two different textured surfaces were evaluated: SilkSurface (nanotextured) and VelvetSurface (micro-textured).

resultsImplants were placed between April 2013 and April 2016. A total of 44 complications were reported, with an overall complication rate of 0.76%, and the rate of reoperation was 0.76% over an interval of 3 years. There were no late complications and no cases of primary capsular contracture. No differences in complication rates were observed because of the implant date. However, among patients who received implants 300 to 499 cc in volume, complication rates were significantly lower with SilkSurface compared with VelvetSurface implants. Advanced statistical analysis supported the validity of the low complication rate reported in this study.

conclusionsOverall, these findings suggest that Motiva silicone breast implants are associated with very low rates of complication and reoperation, and that the nano-textured SilkSurface implant is associated with fewer complications than micro-textured implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3:

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast ImplantationBreast ImplantsFemaleHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMiddle AgedNanostructuresPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesSilicone GelsSurface PropertiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultSilicone Gels

Identifiers

PMID29040364
PMCPMC5952962
OpenAlexW2755392173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.