Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29040337›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A comparison of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli from clinical, recreational water and wastewater samples associated in time and location.

Silje B Jørgensen, Arne V Søraas, Lotte S Arnesen, Truls M Leegaard, Arnfinn Sundsfjord, Pål A Jenum

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producingJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Limited clonality but widespread plasmid sharing of ESBL-producingCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of Cefotaxime-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Zooplankton as a Transitional Host forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Removal of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-ProducingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silje B JørgensenSection for Medical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3135-1431
Arne V SøraasSection for Medical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.
Lotte S ArnesenNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Truls M LeegaardDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Arnfinn SundsfjordNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Pål A JenumSection for Medical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) are excreted via effluents and sewage into the environment where they can re-contaminate humans and animals. The aim of this observational study was to detect and quantify ESBL-EC in recreational water and wastewater, and perform a genetic and phenotypic comparative analysis of the environmental strains with geographically associated human urinary ESBL-EC. Recreational fresh- and saltwater samples from four different beaches and wastewater samples from a nearby sewage plant were filtered and cultured on differential and ESBL-selective media. After antimicrobial susceptibility testing and multi-locus variable number of tandem repeats assay (MLVA), selected ESBL-EC strains from recreational water were characterized by whole genome sequencing (WGS) and compared to wastewater and human urine isolates from people living in the same area. We detected ESBL-EC in recreational water samples on 8/20 occasions (40%), representing all sites. The ratio of ESBL-EC to total number of E. coli colony forming units varied from 0 to 3.8%. ESBL-EC were present in all wastewater samples in ratios of 0.56-0.75%. ST131 was most prevalent in urine and wastewater samples, while ST10 dominated in water samples. Eight STs and identical ESBL-EC MLVA-types were detected in all compartments. Clinical ESBL-EC isolates were more likely to be multidrug-resistant (p<0.001). This study confirms that ESBL-EC, including those that are capable of causing human infection, are present in recreational waters where there is a potential for human exposure and subsequent gut colonisation and infection in bathers. Multidrug-resistant E. coli strains are present in urban aquatic environments even in countries where antibiotic consumption in both humans and animals is highly restricted.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialWater MicrobiologyAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBathing Beachesbeta-LactamasesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEpidemiological MonitoringEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFresh WaterGene ExpressionHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesWastewater

Identifiers

PMID29040337
PMCPMC5645111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.