Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29040267›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Protecting cows in small holder farms in East Africa from tsetse flies by mimicking the odor profile of a non-host bovid.

Rajinder K Saini, Benedict O Orindi, Norber Mbahin, John A Andoke, Peter N Muasa, David M Mbuvi, Caroline M Muya, John A Pickett, Christian W Borgemeister

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tsetse Bloodmeal Analyses Incriminate the Common WarthogPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rajinder K SainiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6922
Benedict O OrindiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Norber MbahinInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
John A AndokeInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Peter N MuasaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
David M MbuviInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Caroline M MuyaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
John A PickettRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts., AL, United Kingdom.
Christian W BorgemeisterInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KERothamsted Research · GBUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor the first time, differential attraction of pathogen vectors to vertebrate animals is investigated for novel repellents which when applied to preferred host animals turn them into non-hosts thereby providing a new paradigm for innovative vector control. For effectively controlling tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), vectors of African trypanosomosis, causing nagana, repellents more powerful than plant derived, from a non-host animal the waterbuck, Kobus ellipsiprymnus defassa, have recently been identified. Here we investigate these repellents in the field to protect cattle from nagana by making cattle as unattractive as the buck. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo dispense the waterbuck repellents comprising guaiacol, geranylacetone, pentanoic acid and δ-octalactone, (patent application) we developed an innovative collar-mounted release system for individual cattle. We tested protecting cattle, under natural tsetse challenge, from tsetse transmitted nagana in a large field trial comprising 1,100 cattle with repellent collars in Kenya for 24 months. The collars provided substantial protection to livestock from trypanosome infection by reducing disease levels >80%. Protected cattle were healthier, showed significantly reduced disease levels, higher packed cell volume and significantly increased weight. Collars >60% reduced trypanocide use, 72.7% increase in ownership of oxen per household and enhanced traction power (protected animals ploughed 66% more land than unprotected). Land under cultivation increased by 73.4%. Increase in traction power of protected animals reduced by 69.1% acres tilled by hand per household per ploughing season. Improved food security and household income from very high acceptance of collars (99%) motivated the farmers to form a registered community based organization promoting collars for integrated tsetse control and their commercialization. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Clear demonstration that repellents from un-preferred hosts prevent contact between host and vector, thereby preventing disease transmission: a new paradigm for vector control. Evidence that deploying water buck repellents converts cattle into non-hosts for tsetse flies-'cows in waterbuck clothing'.

Indexed as

Insect RepellentsOdorantsAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAntelopesCattleCattle DiseasesInsect VectorsKenyaTrypanosomiasis, AfricanTsetse FliesInsect Repellents

Identifiers

PMID29040267
PMCPMC5659797
OpenAlexW2766631172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.