Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29039897›Full record

ReviewInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: what does it mean?

Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa, Victor Srougi, Igor Nunes-Silva, Mohammed Baghdadi, Gregory Rembeyo, Sophie S Eiffel, Eric Barret, Francois Rozet, Marc Galiano, Xavier Cathelineau and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Association between Pre-Operative Total Prostate-Specific Antigen and Survivorship of Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael Tourinho-BarbosaDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Victor SrougiDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Igor Nunes-SilvaDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Mohammed BaghdadiDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Gregory RembeyoDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Sophie S EiffelDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Eric BarretDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Francois RozetDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Marc GalianoDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Xavier CathelineauDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Rafael Sanchez-SalasDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical prostatectomy (RP) has been used as the main primary treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) for many years with excellent oncologic results. However, approximately 20-40% of those patients has failed to RP and presented biochemical recurrence (BCR). Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has been the pivotal tool for recurrence diagnosis, but there is no consensus about the best PSA threshold to define BCR until this moment. The natural history of BCR after surgical procedure is highly variable, but it is important to distinguish biochemical and clinical recurrence and to find the correct timing to start multimodal treatment strategy. Also, it is important to understand the role of each clinical and pathological feature of prostate cancer in BCR, progression to metastatic disease and cancer specific mortality (CSM). Review design: A simple review was made in Medline for articles written in English language about biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

objectiveTo provide an updated assessment of BCR definition, its meaning, PCa natural history after BCR and the weight of each clinical/pathological feature and risk group classifications in BCR, metastatic disease and CSM.

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29039897
PMCPMC5815528
OpenAlexW2789785430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.