Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29039802›Full record

ArticleNutrients2017

Effects of an Advocacy Trial on Food Industry Salt Reduction Efforts-An Interim Process Evaluation.

Helen Trevena, Kristina Petersen, Anne Marie Thow, Elizabeth K Dunford, Jason H Y Wu, Bruce Neal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen TrevenaFood Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 20, Missenden Road, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. helen.trevena@sydney.edu.au.
Kristina PetersenFood Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 20, Missenden Road, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. kpetersen@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Anne Marie ThowMenzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. annemarie.thow@sydney.edu.au.
Elizabeth K DunfordFood Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 20, Missenden Road, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. edunford@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4505-3256
Jason H Y WuFood Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 20, Missenden Road, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. Jwu1@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2073-3562
Bruce NealFood Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 20, Missenden Road, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. bneal@georgeinstitute.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decisions made by food companies are a potent factor shaping the nutritional quality of the food supply. A number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) advocate for corporate action to reduce salt levels in foods, but few data define the effectiveness of advocacy. This present report describes the process evaluation of an advocacy intervention delivered by one Australian NGO directly to food companies to reduce the salt content of processed foods. Food companies were randomly assigned to intervention (

Indexed as

Consumer AdvocacyFood AnalysisAustraliaFood IndustryHealth PromotionHumansNutrition PolicyNutritive ValueSodium ChlorideSodium Chloride, DietarySodium ChlorideSodium Chloride, Dietaryadvocacyfood companiesrandomized trialsalt reduction

Identifiers

PMID29039802
PMCPMC5691744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.