Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29039136›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2018

Cancer risk management in Tasmanian women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Stephanie Kearton, Karen Wills, Michael Bunting, Penny Blomfield, Paul A James, Jo Burke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie KeartonTasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Karen WillsMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Michael BuntingDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Penny BlomfieldDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Paul A JamesTasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Jo BurkeTasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. jo.burke@ths.tas.gov.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women carrying germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly increased lifetime risks of breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. To manage the breast cancer risk women may elect to have breast screening by MRI/mammogram from age 30, to take risk-reducing medication, or to have a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. To manage the tubo-ovarian cancer risk, the only effective strategy is to have a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, recommended by age 40 (BRCA1) or 'around' age 40 (BRCA2). Early studies suggested that uptake of these cancer risk-reducing strategies was low. More recent studies have revealed higher rates of uptake, however it is unclear whether uptake is genuinely improving or whether the higher uptake rates reflect changes in the populations studied. In this study we surveyed 193 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the state of Tasmania to determine the uptake of cancer risk-reducing strategies and what factors might influence women's decisions in relation to both gynaecological and breast surgery. We observed that uptake of risk management strategies varied depending on the strength of the recommendation in the national guidelines. Uptake rates were > 90% for strategies which are strongly recommended, such as breast screening by MRI/mammogram and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and were unaffected by demographic factors such as socio-economic disadvantage and educational achievement. Uptake rates were much lower for strategies which are presented in the guidelines as options for consideration and where patient choice and shared decision making are encouraged, such as prophylactic mastectomy (29%) and chemoprevention (1%) and in the case of prophylactic mastectomy, were influenced by both socio-economic advantage and educational achievement.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHumansMiddle AgedMutationProphylactic MastectomySalpingo-oophorectomySurveys and QuestionnairesTasmaniaBRCA1BRCA2Breast cancerOvarian cancerRisk-management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.