Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29039047›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2018

The expression pattern of keratin 24 in tissue-engineered dermo-epidermal human skin substitutes in an in vivo model.

Agnes S Klar, Katarzyna Michalak, Sophie Böttcher-Haberzeth, Ernst Reichmann, Martin Meuli, Thomas Biedermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Isolation and Culture of Human Dermal Fibroblasts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Human fetal skin derived merkel cells display distinctive characteristicsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnes S KlarTissue Biology Research Unit, Department of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. agnes.klar@kispi.uzh.ch.
Katarzyna MichalakTissue Biology Research Unit, Department of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sophie Böttcher-HaberzethDepartment of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ernst ReichmannTissue Biology Research Unit, Department of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin MeuliDepartment of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas BiedermannTissue Biology Research Unit, Department of Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Children's Hospital Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesThe use of autologous tissue-engineered skin substitutes is a promising approach to cover large skin defects in patients. Preclinical investigation is pivotal to test and improve the quality of these bio-engineered substitutes. In the skin, the epidermis, formed mainly by keratinocytes, provides the first physical barrier protecting from the environment. Proper keratinocyte differentiation and, thus, formation of a stratified epidermis is essential for this function. Keratins, the main structural support of keratinocytes, play a vital role regarding differentiation of keratinocytes. Here, we examined the expression pattern of a recently described keratinocyte differentiation marker, namely Keratin 24, in our skin substitutes. MATERIALS AND

methodsHuman epidermal keratinocytes, melanocytes, dermal fibroblasts, palmar fibroblasts or sweat gland cells were used to prepare skin substitutes. Fibroblast-containing collagen hydrogels were prepared, and keratinocytes or sweat gland cells and melanocytes were seeded onto the hydrogels. The generated tissue-engineered dermo-epidermal skin analogs were transplanted onto full-thickness skin wounds created on the back of immuno-incompetent rats. The skin substitutes were excised at different time points and histologically examined with regard to Keratin 24 expression.

resultsWe observed the expression of Keratin 24 in keratinocytes of the upper stratum spinosum of the epidermis. In particular, we observed an intensified expression of Keratin 24 13 weeks after transplantation compared to 4 weeks after transplantation. Importantly, we noticed a markedly higher presence of Keratin 24 in more spinous layers if we used palmar fibroblasts or sweat gland cells in our skin substitutes compared non-palmar fibroblasts or epidermal keratinocytes.

conclusionOur observations prove that the keratinocyte differentiation marker Keratin 24 is expressed in our dermo-epidermal skin substitutes in a normal pattern. This highlights that our bio-engineered skin analogs mature and reach homeostasis in an in vivo assay. These findings harbor favorable implications regarding future clinical application.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAdolescentAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChildChild, PreschoolDermisEpidermal CellsEpidermisFemaleHumansInfantKeratins, Type IMaleRatsKeratins, Type IKRT24 protein, humanRNA

Identifiers

PMID29039047
OpenAlexW2767044824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.