Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038903›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2017

[Nontuberculous mycobacteria in sputum : Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment].

J Rademacher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J RademacherKlinik für Pneumologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 306125, Hannover, Deutschland. Rademacher.Jessica@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary diseases caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) have increased over the last years and decades in Germany and also worldwide. Because the disease is more frequent in patients with immunodeficiencies and chronic respiratory diseases, e.g. bronchiectasis, advanced chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and cystic fibrosis (CF), an infection with mycobacteria should always be considered in this patient group. The detection in sputum alone is not an indication for treatment but the correct diagnosis should be based on the appropriate clinical symptoms as well as radiological and microbiological criteria. The diagnosis is often delayed because the symptoms are unspecific. The treatment of pulmonary NTM disease is difficult and tedious and for these reasons is often prematurely terminated. Adherence of treating physicians to the guidelines is also conspicuously low. Before starting treatment, it is important to carefully define the goals and clarify the risks and benefits of the treatment with the patient. As adverse toxic events can occur during treatment, it should be closely monitored. In the case of an infrequent pathogen or a severe course of the disease, referral to an NTM specialist center should be undertaken.

Indexed as

Nontuberculous MycobacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiagnosis, DifferentialGuideline AdherenceHumansMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousOpportunistic InfectionsReferral and ConsultationSputumTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsBronchiectasisChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCystic fibrosisDrug toxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.