Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2017
Pre-peritoneal local anaesthetic does not reduce post-operative pain in laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preperitoneal bupivacaine instillation in addition to TAP block for pain control in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomised controlled trial.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Trial
- A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of the effects of infusing local analgesia on post-operative pain during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Single-Shot Subcutaneous Lidocaine Infiltration at Closure Is Associated with Reduced Early Pain and Opioid Requirement After Single-Incision Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain management of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Article
- Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Article
- Comment to: Pre-peritoneal local anaesthetic does not reduce post-operative pain in laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Kulasegaran S, Rohan M, Pearless L, Hulme-Moir M.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLaparoscopic total extra-peritoneal hernia repair (TEP) is associated with less post-operative pain and earlier return to normal activity compared to open hernia repair (OHP). Despite this, post-operative pain remains a major issue. The aim of this double-blinded randomized controlled trial was to identify whether the instillation of local anaesthetic in the pre-peritoneal space improves pain scores following TEP.
methodsOne hundred patients undergoing laparoscopic total pre-peritoneal hernia repair (TEP) between the years of 2009-2014 were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mL of normal saline or 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline. Visual analogue scores (VAS 0-10) were recorded post-operatively at the 4 h, 1 day, 2 weeks, and 6 week mark. Secondary endpoints included complications, time to discharge, and return to normal activity.
results51 patients were allocated to the local group. 49 patients were allocated to the placebo group. The baseline characteristics and demographics of patients in both groups were comparable. Patients in the local group had similar VAS scores compared to the placebo group at both 4 h (1.1 vs. 1.4, respectively; p = 0.19) and 24 h (2.1 vs. 2.3; p = 0.63). No statistically significant difference noted in other primary and secondary outcomes.
conclusionAlthough the concept of pre-peritoneal local anaesthetic instillation following laparoscopic TEP is attractive, this appropriately powered study has failed to show any advantage in pain scores at 4 and 24 h. The pain scores recorded, however, were remarkably low in both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.