Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038871›Full record

GuidelineEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2018

The Global Spine Care Initiative: a consensus process to develop and validate a stratification scheme for surgical care of spinal disorders as a guide for improved resource utilization in low- and middle-income communities.

Emre Acaroğlu, Tiro Mmopelwa, Selcen Yüksel, Selim Ayhan, Margareta Nordin, Kristi Randhawa, Scott Haldeman

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Global Spine Care Initiative: World Spine Care executive summary on reducing spine-related disability in low- and middle-income communities.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  4. The Global Spine Care Initiative: methodology, contributors, and disclosures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  5. Controlling the burden of spinal disorders in low- and middle-income countries.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Review
  6. The Global Spine Care Initiative: resources to implement a spine care program.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  7. The Global Spine Care Initiative: care pathway for people with spine-related concerns.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  8. The Global Spine Care Initiative: model of care and implementation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  9. The Global Spine Care Initiative: classification system for spine-related concerns.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emre AcaroğluARTES Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey. acaroglue@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8163-2944
Tiro MmopelwaARTES Spine Centre Ankara, Life Gaborone Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana.
Selcen YükselDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-8660
Selim AyhanARTES Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0153-3012
Margareta NordinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0356-8665
Kristi RandhawaUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT)-Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC) Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6563-7203
Scott HaldemanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Santa Ana, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-9562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a stratification scheme for surgical spinal care to serve as a framework for referrals and distribution of patients with spinal disorders.

methodsWe used a modified Delphi process. A literature search identified experts for the consensus panel and the panel was expanded by inviting spine surgeons known to be global opinion leaders. After creating a seed document of five hierarchical levels of surgical care, a four-step modified Delphi process (question validation, collection of factors, evaluation of factors, re-evaluation of factors) was performed.

resultsOf 78 invited experts, 19 participated in round 1, and of the 19, 14 participated in 2, and 12 in 3 and 4. Consensus was fairly heterogeneous for levels of care 2-4 (moderate resources). Only simple assessment methods based on the clinical skills of the medical personnel were considered feasible and safe in low-resource settings. Diagnosis, staging, and treatment were deemed feasible and safe in a specialized spine center. Accurate diagnostic workup was deemed feasible and safe for lower levels of care complexity (from level 3 upwards) compared to non-invasive procedures (level 4) and the full range of invasive procedures (level 5).

conclusionThis study introduces a five-level stratification scheme for the surgical care of spinal disorders. This stratification may provide input into the Global Spine Care Initiative care pathway that will be applied in medically underserved areas and low- and middle-income countries. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Spinal DiseasesConservative TreatmentDelphi TechniqueDeveloping CountriesDiagnostic ImagingHumansMedical History TakingOrthopedic ProceduresPhysical ExaminationRisk AssessmentDelivery of health careGeneral surgeryHealth care facilities, manpower, and servicesOperativeSpineSurgical procedures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.