Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038774›Full record

Review3 Biotech2017

Interaction of turmeric (

Ajay Kumar, Amit Kishore Singh, Manish Singh Kaushik, Surabhi Kirti Mishra, Pratima Raj, P K Singh, K D Pandey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Curcumin on Biofilm Production and Associated Gene in Multidrug-ResistantInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genus Curcuma: chemical and ethnopharmacological role in aging process.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024
    Review
  6. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Rhizobacterial mediated interactions inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ajay Kumar *Center of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Amit Kishore Singh *Center of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Manish Singh KaushikCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Surabhi Kirti MishraInstitute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, D.R.D.O, New Delhi, India.
Pratima RajMagadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar India.
P K SinghCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
K D PandeyCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CurcuminEndophyteGrowthInoculationRhizobacteriaTurmeric

Identifiers

PMID29038774
PMCPMC5624808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.