Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038612›Full record

ReviewDisease markers2017

DNA Methylation as a Noninvasive Epigenetic Biomarker for the Detection of Cancer.

Catherine Leygo, Marissa Williams, Hong Chuan Jin, Michael W Y Chan, Wai Kit Chu, Michael Grusch, Yuen Yee Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease markers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the Needle: Is Liquid Biopsy the Future of Veterinary Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Blood biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine LeygoAsbestos Disease Research Institute, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Rhodes, NSW, Australia.
Marissa WilliamsAsbestos Disease Research Institute, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Rhodes, NSW, Australia.
Hong Chuan JinBiomedical Research Center, Sir Runrun Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6697-3097
Michael W Y ChanInstitute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Cheng University, Min-Hsiung, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0314-2437
Wai Kit ChuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Michael GruschInstitute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Yuen Yee ChengAsbestos Disease Research Institute, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Rhodes, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7060-0624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the high incidence and mortality rates of cancer, early and accurate diagnosis is an important priority for assigning optimal treatment for each individual with suspected illness. Biomarkers are crucial in the screening of patients with a high risk of developing cancer, diagnosing patients with suspicious tumours at the earliest possible stage, establishing an accurate prognosis, and predicting and monitoring the response to specific therapies. Epigenetic alterations are innovative biomarkers for cancer, due to their stability, frequency, and noninvasive accessibility in bodily fluids. Epigenetic modifications are also reversible and potentially useful as therapeutic targets. Despite this, there is still a lack of accurate biomarkers for the conclusive diagnosis of most cancer types; thus, there is a strong need for continued investigation to expand this area of research. In this review, we summarise current knowledge on methylated DNA and its implications in cancer to explore its potential as an epigenetic biomarker to be translated for clinical application. We propose that the identification of biomarkers with higher accuracy and more effective detection methods will enable improved clinical management of patients and the intervention at early-stage disease.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorHumansPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29038612
PMCPMC5605861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.