Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A novel machine learning approach reveals latent vascular phenotypes predictive of renal cancer outcome.

Nathan Ing, Fangjin Huang, Andrew Conley, Sungyong You, Zhaoxuan Ma, Sergey Klimov, Chisato Ohe, Xiaopu Yuan, Mahul B Amin, Robert Figlin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Comprehensive Look at In Vitro Angiogenesis Image Analysis Software.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vascularizing the brainiScience · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Machine learning analysis of TCGA cancer data.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021
    Article
  19. Cancer Explant Models.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan IngDepartment of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Fangjin HuangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8711-5908
Andrew ConleyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sungyong YouDepartment of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3513-1783
Zhaoxuan MaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sergey KlimovDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chisato OheDepartment of Pathology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Xiaopu YuanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mahul B AminDepartment of Pathology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Robert FiglinSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Arkadiusz GertychDepartment of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Arkadiusz.Gertych@cshs.org.
Beatrice S KnudsenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Beatrice.Knudsen@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression signatures are commonly used as predictive biomarkers, but do not capture structural features within the tissue architecture. Here we apply a 2-step machine learning framework for quantitative imaging of tumor vasculature to derive a spatially informed, prognostic gene signature. The trained algorithms classify endothelial cells and generate a vascular area mask (VAM) in H&E micrographs of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Quantification of VAMs led to the discovery of 9 vascular features (9VF) that predicted disease-free-survival in a discovery cohort (n = 64, HR = 2.3). Correlation analysis and information gain identified a 14 gene expression signature related to the 9VF's. Two generalized linear models with elastic net regularization (14VF and 14GT), based on the 14 genes, separated independent cohorts of up to 301 cases into good and poor disease-free survival groups (14VF HR = 2.4, 14GT HR = 3.33). For the first time, we successfully applied digital image analysis and targeted machine learning to develop prognostic, morphology-based, gene expression signatures from the vascular architecture. This novel morphogenomic approach has the potential to improve previous methods for biomarker development.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29038551
PMCPMC5643431
OpenAlexW2764168238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.