ArticleScientific reports2017
Neural Network for Nanoscience Scanning Electron Microscope Image Recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for nanoscience scanning electron microscope image classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-driven feature recognition of SEM profiles in deep reactive ion etching based on physics-constrained variational autoencoder.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Developing machine learning for heterogeneous catalysis with experimental and computational data.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025Review
- Integrating Deep Learning and Real-Time Imaging to Visualize In Situ Self-Assembly of Self-Healing Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Formed by Protein and Polysaccharide Fibers.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- A comprehensive and quantitative SEM-EDS analytical process applied to lithium-ion battery electrodes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Convergence of Nanotechnology and Machine Learning: The State of the Art, Challenges, and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- In-situ particle analysis with heterogeneous background: a machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Inspired Nanowire Classification Method based on Nanowire Array Scanning Electron Microscope Images.Open research Europe · 2024Article
- Convolutional neural networks for mode on-demand high finesse optical resonator design.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep learning for automated size and shape analysis of nanoparticles in scanning electron microscopy.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Classification of scanning electron microscope images of pharmaceutical excipients using deep convolutional neural networks with transfer learning.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2022Article
- Super-Resolving Methodology for Noisy Unpaired Datasets.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Digital Innovation Enabled Nanomaterial Manufacturing; Machine Learning Strategies and Green Perspectives.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Machine Learning Approach for Application-Tailored Nanolubricants' Design.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Identification of Bacterial Drug-Resistant Cells by the Convolutional Neural Network in Transmission Electron Microscope Images.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Hydrothermal polymerization of porous aromatic polyimide networks and machine learning-assisted computational morphology evolution interpretation.Journal of materials chemistry. A · 2021Article
- Efficient few-shot machine learning for classification of EBSD patterns.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Nanoparticle Recognition on Scanning Probe Microscopy Images Using Computer Vision and Deep Learning.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Democratized image analytics by visual programming through integration of deep models and small-scale machine learning.Nature communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper we applied transfer learning techniques for image recognition, automatic categorization, and labeling of nanoscience images obtained by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Roughly 20,000 SEM images were manually classified into 10 categories to form a labeled training set, which can be used as a reference set for future applications of deep learning enhanced algorithms in the nanoscience domain. The categories chosen spanned the range of 0-Dimensional (0D) objects such as particles, 1D nanowires and fibres, 2D films and coated surfaces, and 3D patterned surfaces such as pillars. The training set was used to retrain on the SEM dataset and to compare many convolutional neural network models (Inception-v3, Inception-v4, ResNet). We obtained compatible results by performing a feature extraction of the different models on the same dataset. We performed additional analysis of the classifier on a second test set to further investigate the results both on particular cases and from a statistical point of view. Our algorithm was able to successfully classify around 90% of a test dataset consisting of SEM images, while reduced accuracy was found in the case of images at the boundary between two categories or containing elements of multiple categories. In these cases, the image classification did not identify a predominant category with a high score. We used the statistical outcomes from testing to deploy a semi-automatic workflow able to classify and label images generated by the SEM. Finally, a separate training was performed to determine the volume fraction of coherently aligned nanowires in SEM images. The results were compared with what was obtained using the Local Gradient Orientation method. This example demonstrates the versatility and the potential of transfer learning to address specific tasks of interest in nanoscience applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.