Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038467›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2018

Self-sensing in Bacillus subtilis quorum-sensing systems.

Tasneem Bareia, Shaul Pollak, Avigdor Eldar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bacilli the most important biocontrol agent in Brazilian agriculture: from mechanisms of action to market adoption.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Research Progress on the Effect ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Initiation of swarming inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular Mechanisms of Bacterial Communication and Their Biocontrol.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tasneem BareiaSchool of Molecular Cell Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Shaul PollakSchool of Molecular Cell Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Avigdor EldarSchool of Molecular Cell Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 6997801, Israel. avigdor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-9370
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial cell-cell signalling, or quorum sensing, is characterized by the secretion and groupwide detection of small diffusible signal molecules called autoinducers. This mechanism allows cells to coordinate their behaviour in a density-dependent manner. A quorum-sensing cell may directly respond to the autoinducers it produces in a cell-autonomous and quorum-independent manner, but the strength of this self-sensing effect and its impact on bacterial physiology are unclear. Here, we explore the existence and impact of self-sensing in the Bacillus subtilis ComQXP and Rap-Phr quorum-sensing systems. By comparing the quorum-sensing response of autoinducer-secreting and non-secreting cells in co-culture, we find that secreting cells consistently show a stronger response than non-secreting cells. Combining genetic and quantitative analyses, we demonstrate this effect to be a direct result of self-sensing and rule out an indirect regulatory effect of the autoinducer production genes on response sensitivity. In addition, self-sensing in the ComQXP system affects persistence to antibiotic treatment. Together, these findings indicate the existence of self-sensing in the two most common designs of quorum-sensing systems of Gram-positive bacteria.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsCoculture TechniquesDrug Resistance, BacterialFeedback, PhysiologicalGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMutationQuorum SensingAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29038467
PMCPMC5739288
OpenAlexW2761987660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.