Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038425›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells.

Delphine Lemaçon, Jessica Jackson, Annabel Quinet, Joshua R Brickner, Shan Li, Stephanie Yazinski, Zhongsheng You, Grzegorz Ira, Lee Zou, Nima Mosammaparast and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 302 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
302citing papers in PubMed
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

302 citing papers in PubMed, 411 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

242 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Delphine LemaçonEdward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63104, USA.
Jessica JacksonEdward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63104, USA.
Annabel QuinetEdward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63104, USA.
Joshua R BricknerDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Shan LiDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8228, 660S. Euclid Ave., St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Stephanie YazinskiMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.
Zhongsheng YouDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8228, 660S. Euclid Ave., St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Grzegorz IraDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Lee ZouMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.
Nima MosammaparastDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Alessandro VindigniEdward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63104, USA. avindign@slu.edu.
Saint Louis University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USBaylor College of Medicine · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007067 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TRUE-KROB, HEATHER L · 1985 to 2020
$20.4M
Regulation of DNA recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeR01GM080600 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI IRA, GRZEGORZ A · 2007 to 2024
$5.5M
MECHANISM AND REGULATION OF THE DNA ALKYLATION DAMAGE RESPONSER01CA193318 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MOSAMMAPARAST, NIMA · 2015 to 2024
$3.6M
New Mechanisms of Replication Stress ResponseR01GM108648 · NIGMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI VINDIGNI, ALESSANDRO · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193318NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080600NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108648NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 have emerged as key stabilizing factors for the maintenance of replication fork integrity following replication stress. In their absence, stalled replication forks are extensively degraded by the MRE11 nuclease, leading to chemotherapeutic sensitivity. Here we report that BRCA proteins prevent nucleolytic degradation by protecting replication forks that have undergone fork reversal upon drug treatment. The unprotected regressed arms of reversed forks are the entry point for MRE11 in BRCA-deficient cells. The CtIP protein initiates MRE11-dependent degradation, which is extended by the EXO1 nuclease. Next, we show that the initial limited resection of the regressed arms establishes the substrate for MUS81 in BRCA2-deficient cells. In turn, MUS81 cleavage of regressed forks with a ssDNA tail promotes POLD3-dependent fork rescue. We propose that targeting this pathway may represent a new strategy to modulate BRCA2-deficient cancer cell response to chemotherapeutics that cause fork degradation.BRCA proteins have emerged as key stabilizing factors for the maintenance of replication forks following replication stress. Here the authors describe how reversed replication forks are degraded in the absence of BRCA2, and a MUS81 and POLD3-dependent mechanism of rescue following the withdrawal of genotoxic agent.

Indexed as

BRCA2 ProteinCarrier ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IIIDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesHomologous RecombinationHumansMRE11 Homologue ProteinNuclear ProteinsBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCarrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IIIDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesEXO1 protein, humanExodeoxyribonucleasesMRE11 Homologue ProteinMRE11 protein, humanMUS81 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsPOLD3 protein, humanRBBP8 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29038425
PMCPMC5643552
OpenAlexW2762278714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.