Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038336›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2018

The K-Ras, N-Ras, and H-Ras Isoforms: Unique Conformational Preferences and Implications for Targeting Oncogenic Mutants.

Jillian A Parker, Carla Mattos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Mouse in vivo Model Mimicking MASH-Related HCC Pathogenesis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distinct association of HRAS and KRAS with MnMagnetic resonance letters · 2025
    Article
  10. Structural Dynamics of Rho GTPases.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  11. M-Ras distinct activation scenarios: A mechanistic outlook and targeting.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The βAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jillian A ParkerDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Carla MattosDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Northeastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ras controls a multitude of cellular signaling processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Deregulation of Ras cycling often promotes tumorigenesis and various other developmental disorders, termed RASopothies. Although the structure of Ras has been known for many decades, it is still one of the most highly sought-after drug targets today, and is often referred to as "undruggable." At the center of this paradoxical protein is a lack of understanding of fundamental differences in the G domains between the highly similar Ras isoforms and common oncogenic mutations, despite the immense wealth of knowledge accumulated about this protein to date. A shift in the field during the past few years toward a high-resolution understanding of the structure confirms the hypothesis that each isoform and oncogenic mutation must be considered individually, and that not all Ras mutations are created equal. For the first time in Ras history, we have the ability to directly compare the structures of each wild-type isoform to construct a "base-line" understanding, which can then be used as a springboard for analyzing the effects of oncogenic mutations on the structure-function relationship in Ras. This is a fundamental and large step toward the goal of developing personalized therapies for patients with Ras-driven cancers and diseases.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCarcinogenesisCell MembraneGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMembrane ProteinsMutationNeoplasmsOncogenesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Signal TransductionGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID29038336
PMCPMC6071550
OpenAlexW2766818551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.