Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038175›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Sheela Joseph, Rajinikanth Janakiraman, Geeta Chacko, Rama Jayaraj, Mahiban Thomas, Meera Thomas, Sramana Mukhopadhyay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheela JosephNorthern Territory Medical Program, Centre for Remote Health, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Rajinikanth JanakiramanDepartment of Surgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Geeta ChackoDepartment of Pathology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rama JayarajFaculty of Engineering, Health, Science and the Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Mahiban ThomasDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia.
Meera ThomasDepartment of Pathology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sramana MukhopadhyayDepartment of Pathology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INCharles Darwin University · AUChristian Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTreatment failure and poor 5-year survival in mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has remained unchanged for decades mainly due to advanced stage of presentation and high rates of recurrence. Incomplete surgical removal of the tumour, attributed to lack of reliable methods to delineate the surgical margins, is a major cause of disease recurrence. The predictability of recurrence using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to delineate surgical margins (PRISM) in mucosal HNSCC study aims to redefine margin status by identifying the true extent of the tumour at the molecular level by performing IHC with molecular markers, eukaryotic initiation factor, eIF4Eand tumour suppressor gene, p53, on the surgical margins and test the use of Lugol's iodine and fluorescence visualisation prior to the wide local excision. This article describes the study protocol at its pre - results stage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PRISM-HNSCC is a bilateral observational research being conducted in Darwin, Australia and Vellore, India. Individuals diagnosed with HNSCC will undergo the routine wide local excision of the tumour followed by histopathological assessment. Tumours with clear surgical margins that satisfy the exclusion criteria will be selected for further staining of the margins with eIF4E and p53 antibodies. Results of IHC staining will be correlated with recurrences in an attempt to predict the risk of disease recurrence. Patients in Darwin will undergo intraoperative staining of the lesion with Lugol's iodine and fluorescence visualisation to delineate the excision margins while patients in Vellore will not undertake these tests. The outcomes will be analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PRISM-HNSCC study was approved by the institutional ethics committees in Darwin (Human Research Ethics Committee 13-2036) and Vellore (Institutional Review Board Min. no. 8967). Outcomes will be disseminated through publications in academic journals and presentations at educational meetings and conferences. It will be presented as dissertation at the Charles Darwin University. We will communicate the study results to both participating sites. Participating sites will communicate results with patients who have indicated an interest in knowing the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000715471).

Indexed as

Research DesignAustraliaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EHumansImmunohistochemistryIndiaIntraoperative PeriodMargins of ExcisionMouth NeoplasmsMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualObservational Studies as TopicOtorhinolaryngologic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4ETumor Suppressor Protein p53head and neck squamous cell carcinomaimmunohistochemistryp53surgical margins

Identifiers

PMID29038175
PMCPMC5652552
OpenAlexW2768625211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.