Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038093›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2017

Patient Portal Use and Experience Among Older Adults: Systematic Review.

Dawn K Sakaguchi-Tang, Alyssa L Bosold, Yong K Choi, Anne M Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Digital Patient Experience: Umbrella Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Patient Portal Usage and Outcomes Among Adult Patients with Uncontrolled Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dawn K Sakaguchi-Tang *Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5180-3175
Alyssa L Bosold *Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-2188
Yong K Choi *Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7882-4358
Anne M Turner *Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1915-016X

Funding

Addressing the Personal Health Information Management Needs of Older AdultsR01HS022106 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TURNER, ANNE M · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe older adult population (65 years or older) in the United States is growing, and it is important for communities to consider ways to support the aging population. Patient portals and electronic personal health records (ePHRs) are technologies that could better serve populations with the highest health care needs, such as older adults.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the existing research landscape related to patient portal and ePHR use and experience among older adults and to understand the benefits and barriers to older adults' use and adoption of patient portals and ePHRs.

methodsWe searched six pertinent bibliographic databases for papers, published from 2006 to 2016 and written in English, that focused on adults 60 years or older and their use of or experience with patient portals or ePHRs. We adapted preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to review papers based on exclusion and inclusion criteria. We then applied thematic analysis to identify key themes around use, experience, and adoption.

resultsWe retrieved 199 papers after an initial screening and removal of duplicate papers. Then we applied an inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a final set of 17 papers that focused on 15 separate projects. The majority of papers described studies involving qualitative research, including interviews and focus groups. They looked at the experience and use of ePHRs and patient portals. Overall, we found 2 main barriers to use: (1) privacy and security and (2) access to and ability to use technology and the Internet. We found 2 facilitators: (1) technical assistance and (2) family and provider advice. We also reported on older adults' experience, including satisfaction with the system and improvement of the quality of their health care. Several studies captured features that older adults wanted from these systems such as further assistance managing health-related tasks and contextual health advice and tips.

conclusionsMore research is needed to better understand the patient portal experience among older adults from initial use to adoption. There are also opportunities to explore the role of design in addressing barriers and supporting facilitators to patient portal and ePHR use. Finally, the future use of these systems by older adults should be anticipated and considered in the design process.

Indexed as

agedpatient portalspersonal health recordsusabilityuser experienceutilization

Identifiers

PMID29038093
PMCPMC5662789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.