Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29038090›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2017

Variation in DNA-Damage Responses to an Inhalational Carcinogen (1,3-Butadiene) in Relation to Strain-Specific Differences in Chromatin Accessibility and Gene Transcription Profiles in C57BL/6J and CAST/EiJ Mice.

Grace A Chappell, Jennifer W Israel, Jeremy M Simon, Sebastian Pott, Alexias Safi, Karl Eklund, Kenneth G Sexton, Wanda Bodnar, Jason D Lieb, Gregory E Crawford and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SARS-CoV-2 infection and smoking: What is the association? A brief review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Tissue- and strain-specific effects of a genotoxic carcinogen 1,3-butadiene on chromatin and transcription.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Grace A ChappellDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station , Texas, USA.
Jennifer W IsraelDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jeremy M SimonDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sebastian PottDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Alexias SafiDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Karl EklundDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kenneth G SextonDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Wanda BodnarDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jason D LiebDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gregory E CrawfordDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ivan RusynDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station , Texas, USA.
Terrence S FureyDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USUniversity of Chicago · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Genes, genomes, and genotoxicity: in vivo epigenetic toxicology of 1,3-butadieneR01ES023195 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CRAWFORD, GREGORY E, FUREY, TERRENCE S. · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
Training of Junior Faculty for Careers in Omics of Lung DiseasesK12HL119995 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GOZAL, DAVID, GROSSMAN, ROBERT L. · 2013 to 2017
$1.3M
Data commons for 'omic, microscopy and analysis core facilitiesS10OD018164 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WRAY, GREGORY A. · 2014 to 2014
$598k
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL119995NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES023195NIH HHS S10 OD018164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe damaging effects of exposure to environmental toxicants differentially affect genetically distinct individuals, but the mechanisms contributing to these differences are poorly understood. Genetic variation affects the establishment of the gene regulatory landscape and thus gene expression, and we hypothesized that this contributes to the observed heterogeneity in individual responses to exogenous cellular insults.

objectivesWe performed an MATERIALS AND

methodsWe measured DNA damage, messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) expression, and genome-wide chromatin accessibility in lung tissue from two genetically divergent inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6J and CAST/EiJ, both in unexposed mice and in mice exposed to a model DNA-damaging chemical, 1,3-butadiene.

resultsOur results showed that unexposed CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice have very different chromatin organization and transcription profiles in the lung. Importantly, in unexposed CAST/EiJ mice, which acquired relatively less 1,3-butadiene-induced DNA damage, we observed increased transcription and a more accessible chromatin landscape around genes involved in detoxification pathways. Upon chemical exposure, chromatin was significantly remodeled in the lung of C57BL/6J mice, a strain that acquired higher levels of 1,3-butadiene-induced DNA damage, around the same genes, ultimately resembling the molecular profile of CAST/EiJ.

conclusionsThese results suggest that strain-specific changes in chromatin and transcription in response to chemical exposure lead to a "compensation" for underlying genetic-driven interindividual differences in the baseline chromatin and transcriptional state. This work represents an example of how chemical and environmental exposures can be evaluated to better understand gene-by-environment interactions, and it demonstrates the important role of chromatin response in transcriptomic changes and, potentially, in deleterious effects of exposure. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1937.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAir PollutantsAnimalsButadienesChromatinMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsTranscription, Genetic1,3-butadieneAir PollutantsButadienesChromatin

Identifiers

PMID29038090
PMCPMC5944832
OpenAlexW2765822532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.