Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29037894›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2017

Indentation mapping revealed poroelastic, but not viscoelastic, properties spanning native zonal articular cartilage.

Joseph A Wahlquist, Frank W DelRio, Mark A Randolph, Aaron H Aziz, Chelsea M Heveran, Stephanie J Bryant, Corey P Neu, Virginia L Ferguson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Material properties in regenerating axolotl limbs using inverse finite element analysis.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The heterogeneous mechanical properties of adolescent growth plate cartilage: A study in rabbit.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph A WahlquistDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States.
Frank W DelRioApplied Chemicals and Materials Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, United States.
Mark A RandolphDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Laboratory for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Research Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Aaron H AzizDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States; BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States.
Chelsea M HeveranDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States.
Stephanie J BryantDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States; BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States; Material Science and Engineering Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States.
Corey P NeuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States; BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States.
Virginia L FergusonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States; BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States; Material Science and Engineering Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States. Electronic address: virginia.ferguson@colorado.edu.

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
Mechanically Stiff Hydrogels for Osteochondral Tissue EngineeringR01AR069060 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Stephanie J Bryant · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NISTNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthrosis is a debilitating disease affecting millions, yet engineering materials for cartilage regeneration has proven difficult because of the complex microstructure of this tissue. Articular cartilage, like many biological tissues, produces a time-dependent response to mechanical load that is critical to cell's physiological function in part due to solid and fluid phase interactions and property variations across multiple length scales. Recreating the time-dependent strain and fluid flow may be critical for successfully engineering replacement tissues but thus far has largely been neglected. Here, microindentation is used to accomplish three objectives: (1) quantify a material's time-dependent mechanical response, (2) map material properties at a cellular relevant length scale throughout zonal articular cartilage and (3) elucidate the underlying viscoelastic, poroelastic, and nonlinear poroelastic causes of deformation in articular cartilage. Untreated and trypsin-treated cartilage was sectioned perpendicular to the articular surface and indentation was used to evaluate properties throughout zonal cartilage on the cut surface. The experimental results demonstrated that within all cartilage zones, the mechanical response was well represented by a model assuming nonlinear biphasic behavior and did not follow conventional viscoelastic or linear poroelastic models. Additionally, 10% (w/w) agarose was tested and, as anticipated, behaved as a linear poroelastic material. The approach outlined here provides a method, applicable to many tissues and biomaterials, which reveals and quantifies the underlying causes of time-dependent deformation, elucidates key aspects of material structure and function, and that can be used to provide important inputs for computational models and targets for tissue engineering. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Elucidating the time-dependent mechanical behavior of cartilage, and other biological materials, is critical to adequately recapitulate native mechanosensory cues for cells. We used microindentation to map the time-dependent properties of untreated and trypsin treated cartilage throughout each cartilage zone. Unlike conventional approaches that combine viscoelastic and poroelastic behaviors into a single framework, we deconvoluted the mechanical response into separate contributions to time-dependent behavior. Poroelastic effects in all cartilage zones dominated the time-dependent behavior of articular cartilage, and a model that incorporates tension-compression nonlinearity best represented cartilage mechanical behavior. These results can be used to assess the success of regeneration and repair approaches, as design targets for tissue engineering, and for development of accurate computational models.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsCartilage, ArticularElasticityPorositySepharoseSwineSepharoseMappingMicroindentationPoroelasticViscoelasticZonal cartilage

Identifiers

PMID29037894
PMCPMC5703066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.