Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29037483›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2017

New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns.

Joshua I Rosenbloom, Molly J Stout, Methodius G Tuuli, Candice L Woolfolk, Julia D López, George A Macones, Alison G Cahill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The transition from latent to active labor and adverse obstetrical outcomes.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua I RosenbloomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: rosenbloomj@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Molly J StoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Methodius G TuuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Candice L WoolfolkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Julia D LópezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
George A MaconesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Alison G CahillDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

PREDICTING FETAL ACIDEMIA WITH INTRAPARTUM ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART RATE MONITORINGR01HD061619 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAHILL, ALISON G, MACONES, GEORGE A · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2010 the Consortium on Safe Labor published labor curves. It was proposed that the rate of cesarean delivery could be lowered by avoiding the diagnosis of arrest of dilation before 6 cm. However, there is little information on the uptake of the guidelines and on changes in cesarean delivery rates that may have occurred.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to test the following hypotheses: (1) among patients laboring at term, rates of arrest of dilation disorders have decreased, leading to a decrease in the rate of cesarean delivery; (2) in the second stage, pushing duration prior to diagnosis of arrest of descent has increased, also leading to a reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery for this indication. As a secondary aim, we investigated changes in maternal and neonatal morbidity. STUDY

designThis was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of all patients presenting at ≥37 weeks' gestation from 2010 through 2014 with a nonanomalous vertex singleton and no prior history of cesarean delivery. Rates of cesarean delivery, arrest of dilation, and changes in rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity were calculated in crude and adjusted models. Cervical dilation at diagnosis of the arrest of dilation, time spent at the maximal dilation prior to diagnosis of arrest of dilation, and time in the second stage prior to the diagnosis of arrest of descent were compared over the study period.

resultsThere were 7845 eligible patients. The cesarean delivery rate in 2010 was 15.8% and, in 2014, 17.7% (P trend = .51). In patients undergoing cesarean delivery for the arrest of dilation, the median cervical dilation at the time of cesarean delivery was at 5.5 cm in 2010 and 6.0 cm in 2014 (P trend = .94). In these patients, there was an increase in the time spent at last dilation: 3.8 hours in 2010 to 5.2 hours in 2014 (P trend = .02). There was no change in the frequency of patients diagnosed with the arrest of dilation at <6 cm: 51.4% in 2010 and 48.6% in 2014 (P trend = .56). However, in these patients, the median time spent at the last cervical dilation was 4.0 hours in 2010 and 6.7 hours in 2014 (P trend = .046). There were 206 cesarean deliveries for the arrest of descent. The median pushing time in these patients increased in multiparous patients from 1.1 hours in 2010 to 3.4 hours in 2014 (P trend = .009); in nulliparous patients these times were 2.7 hours in 2010 and 3.8 hours in 2014 (P trend = .09). There was a significant trend toward increasing adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes (P < .001 for each). The adjusted odds ratio for adverse maternal outcome for 2014 compared with 2010 was 1.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.17); however, considering only transfusion, hemorrhage, or infection, there was no difference (P trend = .96). The adjusted odds ratio of adverse neonatal outcome in 2014 compared with 2010 was 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.36).

conclusionDespite significant changes in labor management that have occurred over the initial years since publication of the new labor curves and associated guidelines, the primary cesarean delivery rate was not reduced and there has been an increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity in our institution. A randomized controlled trial is needed.

Indexed as

AdultBlood TransfusionCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDystociaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedLabor, ObstetricLabor Stage, FirstObstetric Labor ComplicationsOdds RatioPostpartum HemorrhagePractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyarrest of descentarrest of dilationcesarean deliveryguidelineslabor managementmaternal morbidityneonatal morbidity

Identifiers

PMID29037483
PMCPMC5712240
OpenAlexW2763873101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.