Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29037299›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2017

Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

R Boyd, N Ford, P Padgen, H Cox

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Preventive Treatment for Multidrug- and Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis Exceeds Trial-Based Estimates.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Advances in Molecular Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R BoydDivision of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
N FordCentre for Infectious Disease Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
P PadgenCollege of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
H CoxDivision of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZANew York College of Health Professions · USWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa · ZA

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce transmission and improve patient outcomes, rapid diagnosis and treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) is required.

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing time to treatment for RR-TB and variability using diagnostic testing methods and treatment delivery approach.

designStudies from 2000 to 2015 reporting time to second-line treatment initiation were selected from PubMed and published conference abstracts.

resultsFrom 53 studies, 83 cohorts (13 034 patients) were included. Overall weighted mean time to treatment from specimen collection was 81 days (95%CI 70-91), and was shorter with ambulatory (57 days, 95%CI 40-74) than hospital-based treatment (86 days, 95%CI 71-102). Time to treatment was shorter with genotypic susceptibility testing (38 days, 95%CI 27-49) than phenotypic testing (108 days, 95%CI 98-117). The mean percentage of diagnosed patients initiating treatment was 76% (95%CI 70-83, range 25-100).

conclusionTime to second-line anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation is extremely variable across studies, and often unnecessarily long. Reduced delays are associated with genotypic testing and ambulatory treatment settings. Routine monitoring of the proportion of diagnosed patients initiating treatment and time to treatment are necessary to identify areas for intervention.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAntitubercular AgentsGenotypeHospitalizationHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisRifampinTime-to-TreatmentTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular AgentsRifampin

Identifiers

PMID29037299
PMCPMC5644740
OpenAlexW2765608377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.